C. E. Cox
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
-
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Cancer survivorship and care
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Cancer and Skin Lesions 3
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Christel Rushing (1 shared paper)Andrea L. Pusic (1 shared paper)E. Shelley Hwang (1 shared paper)Tracie Locklear (1 shared paper)Dunya Atisha (1 shared paper)Michael R. Zenn (1 shared paper)Amy P. Abernethy (1 shared paper)Gregory P. Samsa (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases (1 paper)Annals of Surgical Oncology (1 paper)Breast Diseases A Year Book Quarterly (1 paper)PubMed (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
C. E. Cox
8 papers receiving 313 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Cancer Research 209
- Oncology 129
- Surgery 194
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 78
- Dermatology 19
Countries citing papers authored by C. E. Cox
This map shows the geographic impact of C. E. Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. E. Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. E. Cox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. E. Cox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. E. Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. E. Cox. The network helps show where C. E. Cox may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. E. Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 151 | |
| 2 | NCCN Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer. | 2000 | 96 |
| 3 | Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins. | 1998 | 33 |
| 4 | Cytology of lumpectomy specimens. | 1991 | 28 |
| 5 | Natural history and clinical evaluation of the lumpectomy scar. | 1993 | 11 |
| 6 | Role of fine needle aspiration cytology after lumpectomy. | 1995 | 3 |
| 7 | Symposium on oral indanyl carbenicillin in the treatment of urinary-tract infection. Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana. June 6, 1972. | 1973 | 2 |
| 8 | 2014 | 2 |
About C. E. Cox
C. E. Cox is a scholar working on Dermatology, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Small Animals and Surgery, having authored 8 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (3 papers), Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (1 paper), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (1 paper) and Infectious Diseases and Mycology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (209 citations), Oncology (129 citations), Surgery (194 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (78 citations) and Dermatology (19 citations). C. E. Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Christel Rushing, Andrea L. Pusic, E. Shelley Hwang, Tracie Locklear, Dunya Atisha, Michael R. Zenn, Amy P. Abernethy, Gregory P. Samsa, Douglas S. Reintgen and Howard M. Greenberg. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Annals of Surgical Oncology, Breast Diseases A Year Book Quarterly and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.