Ni Ni Ku

2.0k total citations
34 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Ni Ni Ku is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Ni Ni Ku has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 26 papers in Cancer Research and 18 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Ni Ni Ku's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (26 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (25 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (15 papers). Ni Ni Ku is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (26 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (25 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (15 papers). Ni Ni Ku collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and India. Ni Ni Ku's co-authors include Douglas S. Reintgen, Charles E. Cox, Solange Pendas, Claudia G. Berman, Alan R. Shons, Timothy J. Yeatman, Gary H. Lyman, C Berman, John M. Cox and F. Haddad and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, Annual Review of Medicine and The American Journal of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Ni Ni Ku

34 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ni Ni Ku United States 19 1.3k 1.2k 823 426 166 34 1.6k
Peter S. Turk United States 14 1.2k 0.9× 1.1k 1.0× 929 1.1× 494 1.2× 130 0.8× 15 1.7k
Marilia Bedoni Italy 6 1.6k 1.2× 1.3k 1.1× 992 1.2× 543 1.3× 164 1.0× 7 1.9k
Alberto Costa Italy 7 1.5k 1.1× 1.2k 1.0× 1.0k 1.2× 512 1.2× 155 0.9× 9 1.9k
Sharon Galper United States 8 1.4k 1.1× 1.1k 0.9× 729 0.9× 562 1.3× 102 0.6× 8 1.7k
Howard C. Snider United States 16 1.1k 0.9× 783 0.7× 567 0.7× 394 0.9× 99 0.6× 29 1.4k
David L. Krasne United States 9 1.1k 0.9× 927 0.8× 744 0.9× 575 1.3× 149 0.9× 15 1.5k
Solange Pendas United States 14 877 0.7× 744 0.6× 569 0.7× 437 1.0× 131 0.8× 21 1.2k
Jeffrey R. Harris United States 13 1.0k 0.8× 717 0.6× 332 0.4× 523 1.2× 116 0.7× 23 1.3k
Y Aymé France 19 1.8k 1.4× 1.3k 1.1× 612 0.7× 840 2.0× 89 0.5× 34 2.1k
H Brandone France 19 1.9k 1.4× 1.3k 1.1× 588 0.7× 851 2.0× 88 0.5× 33 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Ni Ni Ku

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ni Ni Ku's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ni Ni Ku with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ni Ni Ku more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ni Ni Ku

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ni Ni Ku. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ni Ni Ku. The network helps show where Ni Ni Ku may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ni Ni Ku

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ni Ni Ku. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ni Ni Ku based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ni Ni Ku. Ni Ni Ku is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dupont, Elisabeth, Eric Peltz, Keoni Nguyen, et al.. (2001). Clinical relevance of internal mammary node mapping as a guide to radiation therapy. The American Journal of Surgery. 182(4). 321–324. 37 indexed citations
2.
Dupont, Elisabeth, Charles E. Cox, Keoni Nguyen, et al.. (2001). Utility of Internal Mammary Lymph Node Removal When Noted by Intraoperative Gamma Probe Detection. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 8(10). 833–836. 34 indexed citations
3.
Dupont, Elisabeth, Jessica Wang, Eric Peltz, et al.. (2000). Do Cytokeratin-Positive-Only Sentinel Lymph Nodes Warrant Complete Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer?. The American Surgeon. 66(6). 574–578. 45 indexed citations
4.
Dauway, Emilia, Rosemary Giuliano, F. Haddad, et al.. (1999). LYMPHATIC MAPPING IN BREAST CANCER. Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America. 13(2). 349–371. 24 indexed citations
5.
Ku, Ni Ni. (1999). Automated Papanicolaou smear analysis as a screening tool for female lower genital tract malignancies. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 11(1). 41–43. 8 indexed citations
6.
Ku, Ni Ni. (1999). Pathologic Examination of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer. Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America. 8(3). 469–479. 48 indexed citations
7.
Cox, Charles E., et al.. (1999). The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer11No competing interests declared.. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 189(2). 183–194. 173 indexed citations
8.
Bass, Siddharth S., Gary H. Lyman, Ni Ni Ku, et al.. (1999). Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy. The Breast Journal. 5(5). 288–295. 43 indexed citations
9.
Pendas, Solange, Ni Ni Ku, Douglas S. Reintgen, et al.. (1999). Microstaging of Breast Cancer Patients Using Cytokeratin Staining of the Sentinel Lymph Node. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 6(1). 95–101. 72 indexed citations
10.
Bass, Siddharth S., Emilia Dauway, Ni Ni Ku, et al.. (1999). Lymphatic Mapping with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Breast Cancers <1 centimeter (T1A - T1B). The American Surgeon. 65(9). 857–862. 20 indexed citations
11.
Dauway, Emilia, Rosemary Giuliano, Solange Pendas, et al.. (1999). Lymphatic mapping: a technique providing accurate staging for breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 6(2). 145–154. 9 indexed citations
12.
Cox, C.E., Siddharth S. Bass, Ni Ni Ku, et al.. (1998). Sentinel Lymphadenectomy: A Safe Answer to Less Axillary Surgery?. Recent results in cancer research. 152. 170–179. 26 indexed citations
13.
Pendas, Solange, John M. Cox, Emmanuella Joseph, et al.. (1998). Guidelines for Sentinel Node Biopsy and Lymphatic Mapping of Patients With Breast Cancer. Annals of Surgery. 227(5). 645–653. 487 indexed citations
14.
Cox, C.E., Siddharth S. Bass, John M. Cox, et al.. (1998). Lymphatic mapping in the treatment of breast cancer.. PubMed. 12(9). 1283–92; discussion 1293. 68 indexed citations
15.
Cox, Charles E., Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Gary H. Lyman, et al.. (1997). Cytologic evaluation of lumpectomy margins in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: Clinical outcome. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 4(8). 644–649. 33 indexed citations
16.
Phuphanich, Surasak, Sally B. Zachariah, Babu Zachariah, Ni Ni Ku, & F. Reed Murtagh. (1996). Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Syrinx Associated with Intramedullary Metastases and Leptomeningeal Disease. Journal of Neuroimaging. 6(2). 115–117. 4 indexed citations
17.
Cox, Charles E., Douglas S. Reintgen, Santo V. Nicosia, et al.. (1995). Analysis of residual cancer after diagnostic breast biopsy: An argument for fine-needle aspiration cytology. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2(3). 201–206. 31 indexed citations
18.
Elliott, Paul, Ni Ni Ku, & Mark H. Werner. (1995). Neoplastic Meningitis with Normal Neurological Findings Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results. Journal of Neuroimaging. 5(4). 233–236. 7 indexed citations
19.
Yeatman, Timothy J., Alan Cantor, Thomas J. Smith, et al.. (1995). Tumor Biology of Infiltrating Lobular Carcinoma. Annals of Surgery. 222(4). 549–561. 129 indexed citations
20.
Nicosia, S V, et al.. (1993). Fine needle aspiration biopsy of palpable breast lesions. Review and statistical analysis of 1875 cases. Surgical Oncology. 2(3). 145–160. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026