C. D. Hargis

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 822 citations indexed

About

C. D. Hargis is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, C. D. Hargis has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 822 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Ecology, 3 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 3 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in C. D. Hargis's work include Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (2 papers) and Forest ecology and management (2 papers). C. D. Hargis is often cited by papers focused on Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (2 papers) and Forest ecology and management (2 papers). C. D. Hargis collaborates with scholars based in United States. C. D. Hargis's co-authors include John A. Bissonette, John David, David L. Turner, Dale R. McCullough, Mary M. Rowland, Wendel J. Hann, Victoria A. Saab, Daniel J. Harrison, Terrell D. Rich and John D. Wehausen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Ecology, Journal of Wildlife Management and Landscape Ecology.

In The Last Decade

C. D. Hargis

9 papers receiving 693 citations

Hit Papers

The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the st... 1998 2026 2007 2016 1998 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C. D. Hargis United States 5 523 462 316 106 51 10 822
R.H.G. Jongman Netherlands 12 314 0.6× 452 1.0× 209 0.7× 127 1.2× 75 1.5× 28 781
Klaus C. Ewald Switzerland 8 323 0.6× 329 0.7× 254 0.8× 77 0.7× 118 2.3× 10 678
James R. Strittholt United States 15 580 1.1× 672 1.5× 388 1.2× 198 1.9× 74 1.5× 23 1.0k
Nicola Munro Australia 13 417 0.8× 400 0.9× 392 1.2× 132 1.2× 87 1.7× 18 885
Brenda C. McComb United States 17 606 1.2× 730 1.6× 496 1.6× 146 1.4× 85 1.7× 27 1.1k
William L. Gaines United States 18 813 1.6× 652 1.4× 435 1.4× 174 1.6× 39 0.8× 38 1.1k
Gérard Balent France 15 276 0.5× 354 0.8× 229 0.7× 119 1.1× 156 3.1× 41 737
Assu Gil‐Tena Spain 15 295 0.6× 279 0.6× 311 1.0× 126 1.2× 64 1.3× 20 573
Matthew S. Dietz United States 13 379 0.7× 378 0.8× 218 0.7× 126 1.2× 33 0.6× 19 584
Stefan Kreft Germany 7 440 0.8× 325 0.7× 95 0.3× 92 0.9× 58 1.1× 10 701

Countries citing papers authored by C. D. Hargis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. D. Hargis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. D. Hargis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. D. Hargis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. D. Hargis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. D. Hargis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. D. Hargis. The network helps show where C. D. Hargis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. D. Hargis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. D. Hargis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. D. Hargis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. D. Hargis. C. D. Hargis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Hargis, C. D.. (2021). The Influence of Forest Fragmentation and Landscape Pattern on American Martens and Their Prey. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University).
2.
Forsman, Eric D., et al.. (2006). A Field Test of the Northern Goshawk Bioregional Monitoring Design: Is it Cost Effective?. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 34(1). 215–217. 1 indexed citations
3.
Wisdom, Michael J., Richard S. Holthausen, C. D. Hargis, et al.. (2000). Source habitats for terrestrial vertebrates of focus in the interior Columbia basin: broad-scale trends and management implications. Volume 3 - appendices.. 8 indexed citations
4.
Hargis, C. D., John A. Bissonette, & David L. Turner. (1999). The influence of forest fragmentation and landscape pattern on American martens. Journal of Applied Ecology. 36(1). 157–172. 179 indexed citations
5.
Hargis, C. D., John A. Bissonette, & John David. (1998). The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology. 13(3). 167–186. 531 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Hargis, C. D. & John A. Bissonette. (1997). Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Populations of American Marten in the Intermountain West. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 437–451. 13 indexed citations
7.
Bissonette, John A., et al.. (1997). Scale-Sensitive Properties Influence Marten Demographics. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 368. 2 indexed citations
8.
Hargis, C. D. & John A. Bissonette. (1995). The Influence of Forest Fragmentation and Prey Availability on American Marten Populations: A Multi-Scale Analysis. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 1 indexed citations
9.
Wehausen, John D., et al.. (1987). Mountain Sheep Reintroduction in The Central Sierra: A Cooperative Effort. 23. 60–64. 2 indexed citations
10.
Hargis, C. D. & Dale R. McCullough. (1984). Winter Diet and Habitat Selection of Marten in Yosemite National Park. Journal of Wildlife Management. 48(1). 140–140. 85 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026