C. Ashton Drew

1.1k total citations
18 papers, 696 citations indexed

About

C. Ashton Drew is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, C. Ashton Drew has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 696 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ecology, 7 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 7 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in C. Ashton Drew's work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). C. Ashton Drew is often cited by papers focused on Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). C. Ashton Drew collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. C. Ashton Drew's co-authors include Ajith H. Perera, Chris J. Johnson, Falk Huettmann, Yolanda F. Wiersma, George R. Hess, Matthew J. Rubino, Frank Koch, Michael Drescher, Mark A. Burgman and Lisa J. Buse and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Biological Conservation.

In The Last Decade

C. Ashton Drew

17 papers receiving 669 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
C. Ashton Drew United States	11	345	263	233	229	78	18	696
Robin O’Malley United States	6	322 0.9×	245 0.9×	297 1.3×	267 1.2×	95 1.2×	9	690
Daniel W. Salzer United States	7	411 1.2×	244 0.9×	304 1.3×	247 1.1×	105 1.3×	9	761
Gabriela Cruz-Piñón Mexico	7	371 1.1×	219 0.8×	351 1.5×	138 0.6×	52 0.7×	13	638
Alison R. Holt United Kingdom	14	391 1.1×	282 1.1×	344 1.5×	166 0.7×	166 2.1×	20	902
Kenneth Paul Charman United Kingdom	3	306 0.9×	232 0.9×	276 1.2×	187 0.8×	52 0.7×	6	663
Dawn R. Magness United States	12	408 1.2×	237 0.9×	369 1.6×	220 1.0×	93 1.2×	30	762
Ginger Allington United States	14	332 1.0×	375 1.4×	322 1.4×	176 0.8×	158 2.0×	25	855
Hannah S. Wauchope United Kingdom	12	400 1.2×	208 0.8×	250 1.1×	266 1.2×	170 2.2×	15	800
Aerin L. Jacob Canada	18	326 0.9×	226 0.9×	344 1.5×	124 0.5×	109 1.4×	39	786
Susana Rodríguez‐Buriticá Colombia	11	363 1.1×	243 0.9×	324 1.4×	138 0.6×	112 1.4×	28	753

Countries citing papers authored by C. Ashton Drew

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Ashton Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Ashton Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Ashton Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Ashton Drew

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Ashton Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Ashton Drew. The network helps show where C. Ashton Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. Ashton Drew

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. Ashton Drew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. Ashton Drew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. Ashton Drew. C. Ashton Drew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Iacona, Gwenllian D., Stephanie Avery‐Gomm, Richard F. Maloney, et al.. (2022). Hurdles to developing quantitative decision support for Endangered Species Act resource allocation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3.

Drew, C. Ashton, et al.. (2018). Hydrologic characteristics of freshwater mussel habitat: novel insights from modeled flows. Freshwater Science. 37(2). 343–356. 10 indexed citations

Gerber, Leah R., Michael C. Runge, Richard F. Maloney, et al.. (2018). Endangered species recovery: A resource allocation problem. Science. 362(6412). 284–286. 53 indexed citations

Mordecai, Rua S., et al.. (2017). Indicator-Driven Conservation Planning Across Terrestrial, Freshwater Aquatic, and Marine Ecosystems of the South Atlantic, USA. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. 8(1). 219–233. 11 indexed citations

Collazo, Jaime A., et al.. (2013). Nest occurrence and survival of King Rails in fire-managed coastal marshes in North Carolina and Virginia. Journal of Field Ornithology. 84(4). 355–366. 4 indexed citations

Drescher, Michael, Ajith H. Perera, Chris J. Johnson, et al.. (2013). Toward rigorous use of expert knowledge in ecological research. Ecosphere. 4(7). 1–26. 156 indexed citations

Collazo, Jaime A., et al.. (2013). King Rail (Rallus elegans) Occupancy and Abundance in Fire Managed Coastal Marshes in North Carolina and Virginia. Waterbirds. 36(2). 179–188. 10 indexed citations

Hightower, Joseph E., et al.. (2012). A Bayesian Spawning Habitat Suitability Model for American Shad in Southeastern United States Rivers. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management. 3(2). 184–198. 12 indexed citations

Perera, Ajith H., C. Ashton Drew, & Chris J. Johnson. (2011). Expert Knowledge and Its Application in Landscape Ecology. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 110 indexed citations

10.

Drew, C. Ashton, Yolanda F. Wiersma, & Falk Huettmann. (2011). Predictive species and habitat modeling in landscape ecology : concepts and applications. DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven). 110 indexed citations

11.

Pijanowski, Bryan C., Louis R. Iverson, C. Ashton Drew, et al.. (2009). Addressing the interplay of poverty and the ecology of landscapes: a Grand Challenge Topic for landscape ecologists?. Landscape Ecology. 25(1). 5–16. 17 indexed citations

12.

Drew, C. Ashton, et al.. (2006). Recommendations for Assessing the Effectiveness of Surrogate Species Approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation. 15(12). 3949–3969. 152 indexed citations

13.

Drew, C. Ashton & David B. Eggleston. (2006). Currents, landscape structure, and recruitment success along a passive–active dispersal gradient. Landscape Ecology. 21(6). 917–931. 10 indexed citations

14.

Drew, C. Ashton. (2006). Spatial Ecology of Reef Fish in Backreef and Coral Reef Habitats.. NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries). 1 indexed citations

15.

Hess, George R., et al.. (2005). Comparing the potential effectiveness of conservation planning approaches in central North Carolina, USA. Biological Conservation. 128(3). 358–368. 18 indexed citations

16.

Hess, George R. & C. Ashton Drew. (2004). Inquiry-Guided Learning Through Collaborative Research. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 12(1). 25. 1 indexed citations

17.

Drew, C. Ashton & George R. Hess. (2003). Online Publication Enhances Integration of Current Research in the Classroom. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(1). 1 indexed citations

18.

Drew, C. Ashton. (2001). The East Timor Story: International Law on Trial. European Journal of International Law. 12(4). 651–684. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact