Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Intrinsic spectra and energetics of BeppoSAXGamma–Ray Bursts with known redshifts
2002689 citationsL. Amati, F. Frontera et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Heise's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Heise with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Heise more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Heise. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Heise. The network helps show where J. Heise may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Heise
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Heise.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Heise based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Heise. J. Heise is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cornelisse, R., E. Kuulkers, J. J. M. in ’t Zand, F. Verbunt, & J. Heise. (2002). A four-hours long burst from Serpens X–1. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology).18 indexed citations
7.
Frontera, F., L. Amati, C. Guidorzi, et al.. (2002). GRB011211: BeppoSAX/GRBM data.. GRB Coordinates Network. 1215. 1.3 indexed citations
8.
Piro, L., P. Soffitta, L. A. Antonelli, et al.. (2001). Detection of the X-ray afterglow of GRB011121 by BeppoSAX.. GCN. 1172. 1.1 indexed citations
9.
Cocchi, M., A. Bazzano, L. Natalucci, et al.. (2001). BeppoSAX-WFC observation of the transient SAX J1712.6-3739. MmSAI. 72. 757–760.2 indexed citations
Natalucci, L., A. Bazzano, D. Cardini, et al.. (1999). Two Black Hole X-Ray Novae Observed with BeppoSAX WFC in the Galactic Bulge. 38. 317.
12.
Ubertini, P., A. Bazzano, M. Cocchi, et al.. (1999). Long Term Behaviour of the Hard Tailed X-Ray Burster GS1826-238. 38. 129.1 indexed citations
13.
Heise, J., J. J. M. in’t Zand, Mike Smith, et al.. (1999). DIM Transient X-Ray Binaries in the Galactic Bulge. 38. 297.
14.
Ubertini, P., et al.. (1997). GS 1826-238. International Astronomical Union Circular. 6611. 1.1 indexed citations
15.
Heise, J., et al.. (1994). The spectra and luminosity of super-soft x-ray sources. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 288.2 indexed citations
16.
Sunyaev, R., M. Gilfanov, E. Churazov, et al.. (1990). New X-ray transient source KS 1731-260.. 16. 136–143.1 indexed citations
17.
Heise, J. & F. Verbunt. (1987). Ultraviolet observations of AM HER. STIN. 189. 112–118.3 indexed citations
18.
Vilhu, O., J. P. Caillault, & J. Heise. (1987). Simultaneous EXOSAT and VLA Observations of Active Cool Binaries VW Cep and XY Leo. A Flare in VW Cep. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 19. 706.1 indexed citations
19.
Heise, J., R. Mewe, A. C. Brinkman, et al.. (1978). Detection of both soft and hard X-ray emission from SS Cygni with ANS.. A&A. 63.1 indexed citations
20.
Grindlay, J. E. & J. Heise. (1975). Intense X-Ray Bursts from a Globular Cluster. IAUC. 2879. 1.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.