This map shows the geographic impact of Buenos Aires's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Buenos Aires with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Buenos Aires more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Buenos Aires. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Buenos Aires. The network helps show where Buenos Aires may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Buenos Aires
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Buenos Aires.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Buenos Aires based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Buenos Aires. Buenos Aires is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2013). Agronegocios: entre la sociedad del riesgo y el neoliberalismo..1 indexed citations
4.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2013). Lesbianas en los '70: Pensando los orígenes de una identidad política..
5.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2013). El reino más grande del mundo: la existencia del fandom como fenómeno cultural..
6.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2011). Mapeo de Redes de Colaboración..1 indexed citations
7.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2011). Un fetichismo del yo: vida, obra y mercancía floggers..
8.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2011). Refutación Progresiva: Falsabilismo y Hermenéutica en el desarrollo de las ciencias sociales..2 indexed citations
9.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2009). Experiencias escolares de los sujetos que habitan la 'nocturna..1 indexed citations
10.
Bitton, Roberto, et al.. (2007). LEUCEMIA MIELOIDE CRONICA MECANISMOS GENETICOS DE RESISTENCIA AL IMATINIB. Medicina-buenos Aires. 67. 71–74.
11.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2004). PROGRAMA DE INVESTIGACIÓN SOBRE EL ESTILO PERSONAL DEL TERAPEUTA..2 indexed citations
12.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2004). CAPACITACION DE PERSONAL Y CULTURA . SU ESPECIFICIDAD EN EL MEDIO AERONAUTICO LABORAL.1 indexed citations
13.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2004). UNA APROXIMACIÓN AL PROBLEMA DE LA ADHERENCIA AL TRATAMIENTO CON ADOLESCENTES VULNERABLES..1 indexed citations
14.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2004). TEST DE MATRICES PROGRESIVAS DE RAVEN. NORMAS PERCENTILARES PARA LA CIUDAD DE LA PLATA. EDADES 31 60 AÑOS..4 indexed citations
15.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2004). LAS IDENTIFICACIONES FREUDIANAS EN LA OBRA DE LACAN..1 indexed citations
16.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2004). ESTRATEGIAS METACOGNITIVAS EN LECTURA.1 indexed citations
17.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2004). FREUD Y LA EFICACIA DEL ANÁLISIS..
18.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2004). RASGOS DE PERSONALIDAD Y SU RELACION CON EL ESTRÉS ESCOLAR EN ALUMNOS DEL TERCER CICLO DE LA E.G.B..1 indexed citations
19.
Aires, Buenos, et al.. (2004). ASPECTOS SOCIO CULTURALES Y MÉTRICOS EN LA ADAPTACIÓN DE TESTS: UN ESTUDIO EN BASE AL DEL TEST DE INTELIGENCIA PARA ADULTOS DE WECHSLER III (WAIS-III)..17 indexed citations
20.
Burmeister, Hermann, et al.. (1995). The genus Neoclytus Thomson, 1860 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Clytini) in Argentina. Insecta mundi. 9. 335–346.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.