Buddhapriya Chakrabarti
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Clinical Biochemistry top 1%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Asok C. SenN UenoJack N. LiangMary T. WalshSeikoh HoriuchiNobukazu ArakiYoshimasa MorinoEndre A. Balazs
- Topics
- Connexins and lens biology (14 papers)Biochemical effects in animals (11 papers)Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
Buddhapriya Chakrabarti
62 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Molecular Biology 765
- Clinical Biochemistry 287
- Cell Biology 252
- Physiology 238
- Materials Chemistry 226
Countries citing papers authored by Buddhapriya Chakrabarti
This map shows the geographic impact of Buddhapriya Chakrabarti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Buddhapriya Chakrabarti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Buddhapriya Chakrabarti more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Buddhapriya Chakrabarti
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Buddhapriya Chakrabarti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Buddhapriya Chakrabarti. The network helps show where Buddhapriya Chakrabarti may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Buddhapriya Chakrabarti
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Buddhapriya Chakrabarti. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Buddhapriya Chakrabarti based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Buddhapriya Chakrabarti. Buddhapriya Chakrabarti is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The architecture of the Gram-positive bacterial cell wallbreakdown → | 343 |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 45 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About Buddhapriya Chakrabarti
Buddhapriya Chakrabarti is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes and Cell Biology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Connexins and lens biology (14 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (11 papers) and Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (287 citations), Cell Biology (252 citations) and Molecular Biology (765 citations). Buddhapriya Chakrabarti has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Asok C. Sen, N Ueno, Jack N. Liang, Mary T. Walsh, Seikoh Horiuchi, Nobukazu Araki, Yoshimasa Morino, Endre A. Balazs, Raveen K. J. Tank and Simon J. Foster. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Physical Review Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.