Brooke Winner

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 909 citations indexed

About

Brooke Winner is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Brooke Winner has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 909 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Brooke Winner's work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers) and Gynecological conditions and treatments (3 papers). Brooke Winner is often cited by papers focused on Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers) and Gynecological conditions and treatments (3 papers). Brooke Winner collaborates with scholars based in United States. Brooke Winner's co-authors include Qiuhong Zhao, Christina Buckel, Jeffrey F. Peipert, Tessa Madden, Jenifer E. Allsworth, Gina M. Secura, Nhial T. Tutlam and Candice Woolfolk and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.

In The Last Decade

Brooke Winner

7 papers receiving 863 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception

2012 827 citations Brooke Winner, Jeffrey F. Peipert et al. New England Journal of Medicine profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Brooke Winner United States	5	758	528	297	219	161	7	909
Christina Buckel United States	10	1.1k 1.4×	757 1.4×	356 1.2×	388 1.8×	193 1.2×	16	1.3k
Amy K. Whitaker United States	19	731 1.0×	474 0.9×	330 1.1×	348 1.6×	151 0.9×	43	940
Helen Pymar Canada	17	569 0.8×	314 0.6×	259 0.9×	103 0.5×	136 0.8×	41	766
Maya Blum United States	17	744 1.0×	596 1.1×	276 0.9×	299 1.4×	141 0.9×	43	906
Bryna Harwood United States	18	748 1.0×	476 0.9×	350 1.2×	148 0.7×	122 0.8×	47	872
Ilza Monteiro Brazil	22	803 1.1×	392 0.7×	519 1.7×	149 0.7×	394 2.4×	64	1.2k
Rosemary Kirkman United Kingdom	11	572 0.8×	300 0.6×	137 0.5×	156 0.7×	142 0.9×	21	712
Justin T. Diedrich United States	12	522 0.7×	386 0.7×	265 0.9×	106 0.5×	101 0.6×	25	624
Dalia Brahmi United States	16	510 0.7×	323 0.6×	227 0.8×	104 0.5×	97 0.6×	21	589
Vanessa Cullins United States	12	537 0.7×	268 0.5×	225 0.8×	115 0.5×	166 1.0×	28	711

Countries citing papers authored by Brooke Winner

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brooke Winner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brooke Winner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brooke Winner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brooke Winner

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brooke Winner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brooke Winner. The network helps show where Brooke Winner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brooke Winner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brooke Winner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brooke Winner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brooke Winner. Brooke Winner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Winner, Brooke, et al.. (2019). Uterine Morcellation: Fact and Fiction Surrounding the Recent Controversy.. PubMed. 114(3). 176–180. 4 indexed citations

2.

Tutlam, Nhial T., et al.. (2017). Preoperative Factors That Predict the Need to Morcellate in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 25(1). 158–162. 5 indexed citations

3.

Winner, Brooke, et al.. (2016). Preoperative Factors That Predict the Need to Morcellate in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 23(7). S47–S48. 2 indexed citations

4.

Winner, Brooke, et al.. (2015). Uncontained Compared With Contained Power Morcellation in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 126(4). 834–838. 43 indexed citations

5.

Winner, Brooke, et al.. (2014). Addition of a Vaginal Cuff Closure Model to a Modified Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) Curriculum in an Ob/Gyn Residency Program. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 21(6). S28–S28. 1 indexed citations

6.

Winner, Brooke, Jeffrey F. Peipert, Qiuhong Zhao, et al.. (2012). Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. New England Journal of Medicine. 366(21). 1998–2007. 827 indexed citations breakdown →

7.

Winner, Brooke, Jeffrey F. Peipert, Qiuhong Zhao, et al.. (2012). Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 67(9). 552–553. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact