Brooke Winner
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments 4
- Gynecological conditions and treatments 3
-
- Maternal and fetal healthcare 1
-
- Reproductive Health and Contraception 2
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment 3
- General Health Professions top 5%
-
- Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare 1
-
- Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare 1
-
- Surgical Simulation and Training 1
- Co-authors
- Qiuhong ZhaoChristina BuckelJeffrey F. PeipertJenifer E. AllsworthGina M. SecuraTessa MaddenNhial T. TutlamCandice Woolfolk
- Cited by
- Obstetrics and GynecologyPediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Journals
- Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (3 papers)Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey (1 paper)New England Journal of Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Brooke Winner
7 papers receiving 863 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 297
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 528
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 758
- Reproductive Medicine 161
- General Health Professions 219
Countries citing papers authored by Brooke Winner
This map shows the geographic impact of Brooke Winner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brooke Winner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brooke Winner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brooke Winner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brooke Winner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brooke Winner. The network helps show where Brooke Winner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Brooke Winner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Uterine Morcellation: Fact and Fiction Surrounding the Recent Controversy. | 2019 | 4 |
| 2 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 6 | Effectiveness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptionbreakdown → | 2012 | 827 |
| 7 | 2012 | 27 |
About Brooke Winner
Brooke Winner is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 909 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (1 paper), Maternal and fetal healthcare (1 paper), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper) and Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (297 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (528 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (758 citations). Brooke Winner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Qiuhong Zhao, Christina Buckel, Jeffrey F. Peipert, Jenifer E. Allsworth, Gina M. Secura, Tessa Madden, Nhial T. Tutlam and Candice Woolfolk. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, New England Journal of Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.