Brooke Williams
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 5%
- Co-authors
- James WatsonOscar VenterMichelle WardJames R. AllanHedley S. GranthamHawthorne L. BeyerScott AtkinsonMoreno Di Marco
- Topics
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (11 papers)Land Use and Ecosystem Services (9 papers)Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers)
- Journals
- NatureScienceNature Communications
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Brooke Williams
28 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Global and Planetary Change 607
- Ecology 511
- Ecological Modeling 224
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 223
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 175
Countries citing papers authored by Brooke Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Brooke Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brooke Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brooke Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brooke Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brooke Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brooke Williams. The network helps show where Brooke Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brooke Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brooke Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brooke Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brooke Williams. Brooke Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversitybreakdown → | 127 |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 41 | |
| 12 | 81 | |
| 13 | 143 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 107 | |
| 18 | 49 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Brooke Williams
Brooke Williams is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Ecological Modeling and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (11 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (9 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (224 citations), Global and Planetary Change (607 citations) and Ecology (511 citations). Brooke Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include James Watson, Oscar Venter, Michelle Ward, James R. Allan, Hedley S. Grantham, Hawthorne L. Beyer, Scott Atkinson, Moreno Di Marco, Bernardo B. N. Strassburg and Rajeev Pillay. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.