Jamison Ervin

3.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
23 papers, 904 citations indexed

About

Jamison Ervin is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Jamison Ervin has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 904 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 9 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 6 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Jamison Ervin's work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (10 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers). Jamison Ervin is often cited by papers focused on Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (10 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers). Jamison Ervin collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Jamison Ervin's co-authors include Oscar Venter, Anne Virnig, James Watson, Andrew J. Hansen, S. J. Goetz, Christina Supples, Patrick Jantz, Rajeev Pillay, Scott Atkinson and Susana Rodríguez‐Buriticá and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Jamison Ervin

23 papers receiving 831 citations

Hit Papers

Change in Terrestrial Human Footprint Drives Continued Lo... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jamison Ervin United States 13 563 374 190 138 131 23 904
Daniel Redo Puerto Rico 11 828 1.5× 391 1.0× 238 1.3× 127 0.9× 93 0.7× 13 1.2k
Ruth DeFries United States 6 875 1.6× 534 1.4× 227 1.2× 144 1.0× 112 0.9× 7 1.3k
Nelly Rodríguez Colombia 16 693 1.2× 378 1.0× 248 1.3× 85 0.6× 120 0.9× 35 1.2k
José Volante Argentina 18 840 1.5× 303 0.8× 151 0.8× 107 0.8× 87 0.7× 40 1.3k
Scott Bergen United States 9 796 1.4× 559 1.5× 278 1.5× 111 0.8× 110 0.8× 14 1.4k
Ben ten Brink Netherlands 8 375 0.7× 265 0.7× 149 0.8× 134 1.0× 108 0.8× 10 743
Malika Virah‐Sawmy United Kingdom 15 307 0.5× 233 0.6× 130 0.7× 109 0.8× 72 0.5× 23 777
Rachel Neugarten United States 12 574 1.0× 451 1.2× 259 1.4× 168 1.2× 227 1.7× 18 1.1k
Britaldo Soares Filho Brazil 11 651 1.2× 217 0.6× 160 0.8× 105 0.8× 55 0.4× 17 919
Benoı̂t Mertens Belgium 11 994 1.8× 397 1.1× 190 1.0× 170 1.2× 103 0.8× 19 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Jamison Ervin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jamison Ervin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jamison Ervin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jamison Ervin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jamison Ervin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jamison Ervin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jamison Ervin. The network helps show where Jamison Ervin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jamison Ervin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jamison Ervin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jamison Ervin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jamison Ervin. Jamison Ervin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McGowan, Jennifer, Kristian Metcalfe, Jeffrey O. Hanson, et al.. (2025). Multiple-use spatial planning for sustainable development and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 40(11). 1126–1142. 1 indexed citations
2.
Pillay, Rajeev, James Watson, Andrew J. Hansen, et al.. (2024). Global rarity of high-integrity tropical rainforests for threatened and declining terrestrial vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 121(51). e2413325121–e2413325121. 6 indexed citations
3.
Supples, Christina, et al.. (2024). Leveraging AI for enhanced alignment of national biodiversity targets with the global biodiversity goals. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7. 100198–100198. 3 indexed citations
4.
Pillay, Rajeev, James Watson, Andrew J. Hansen, et al.. (2022). Humid tropical vertebrates are at lower risk of extinction and population decline in forests with higher structural integrity. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 6(12). 1840–1849. 19 indexed citations
5.
Hansen, Andrew J., S. J. Goetz, Christina Supples, et al.. (2021). Toward monitoring forest ecosystem integrity within the post‐2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Conservation Letters. 14(4). 58 indexed citations
6.
Hansen, Andrew J., Patrick Burns, Jamison Ervin, et al.. (2020). A policy-driven framework for conserving the best of Earth’s remaining moist tropical forests. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 4(10). 1377–1384. 60 indexed citations
7.
Williams, Brooke, Oscar Venter, Moreno Di Marco, et al.. (2020). Change in Terrestrial Human Footprint Drives Continued Loss of Intact Ecosystems. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
8.
Hansen, Andrew J., Kevin Barnett, Patrick Jantz, et al.. (2019). Global humid tropics forest structural condition and forest structural integrity maps. Scientific Data. 6(1). 232–232. 48 indexed citations
9.
Sumaila, U. Rashid, Maria Schultz, Tristan D. Tyrrell, et al.. (2017). Investments to reverse biodiversity loss are economically beneficial. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 29. 82–88. 8 indexed citations
11.
Trowbridge, Philip, Jay A Davis, K. Taberski, et al.. (2015). The Regional Monitoring Program for Water Quality in San Francisco Bay, California, USA: Science in support of managing water quality. Regional Studies in Marine Science. 4. 21–33. 20 indexed citations
12.
Ervin, Jamison. (2013). The three new R’s for protected areas: repurpose, reposition and reinvest. PARKS. 19(2). 75–85. 3 indexed citations
13.
Ervin, Jamison. (2011). Integrating protected areas into climate planning. Biodiversity. 12(1). 2–10. 9 indexed citations
14.
Ervin, Jamison, K. Mulongoy, Edward T. Game, et al.. (2010). Making protected areas relevant: a guide to integrating protected areas into wider landscapes, seascapes and sectoral plans and strategies.. 37 indexed citations
15.
Peterson, Richard B., et al.. (2009). Conservation Without Borders: Building Communication and Action Across Disciplinary Boundaries for Effective Conservation. Environmental Management. 45(1). 1–4. 21 indexed citations
16.
Ervin, Jamison & Jeffrey Parrish. (2006). Toward a Framework for Conducting Ecoregional Threats Assessments. 42. 2 indexed citations
17.
Hockings, Marc, et al.. (2004). ASSESSING THE MANAGEMENT OF PROTECTED AREAS: THE WORK OF THE WORLD PARKS CONGRESS BEFORE AND AFTER DURBAN. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy. 7(1-2). 31–42. 11 indexed citations
18.
Ervin, Jamison. (2003). Rapid Assessment of Protected Area Management Effectiveness in Four Countries. BioScience. 53(9). 833–833. 134 indexed citations
19.
Salafsky, Nick, et al.. (2003). Conventions for Defining, Naming, Measuring, Combining, and Mapping Threats in Conservation An Initial Proposal for a Standard System. 28 indexed citations
20.
Viana, Virgílio Maurício, et al.. (1996). Certification of forest products : issues and perspectives. 82 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026