Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Menthol: A simple monoterpene with remarkable biological properties
2013420 citationsGuy Kamatou, Ilze Vermaak et al.Phytochemistryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Brian M. Lawrence
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Brian M. Lawrence's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian M. Lawrence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian M. Lawrence more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brian M. Lawrence
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian M. Lawrence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian M. Lawrence. The network helps show where Brian M. Lawrence may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian M. Lawrence
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian M. Lawrence.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian M. Lawrence based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Brian M. Lawrence. Brian M. Lawrence is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kamatou, Guy, Ilze Vermaak, Alvaro Viljoen, & Brian M. Lawrence. (2013). Menthol: A simple monoterpene with remarkable biological properties. Phytochemistry. 96. 15–25.420 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Lawrence, Brian M.. (2009). Progress in Essential Oils. 18(6). 43–46.310 indexed citations
3.
Lawrence, Brian M.. (2009). A preliminary report on the world production of some selected essential oils and countries.. 34(1). 38–44.26 indexed citations
4.
Lawrence, Brian M. & Antoni Kozłowski. (2007). Estrogenic activity in lavender and tea tree oils: Part II.. 32(5). 119–122.1 indexed citations
5.
Lawrence, Brian M., et al.. (2006). Oleosomes : Natural, self-emulsifying systems. 121(1). 175–188.1 indexed citations
Lawrence, Brian M., et al.. (1988). Flavors and fragrances : a world perspective : proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Essential Oils, Fragrances, and Flavors, Washington, DC, U.S.A., 16-20 November 1986. Elsevier eBooks. 18.22 indexed citations
14.
Lawrence, Brian M.. (1984). Major tropical spices: ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). 9(5). 1–40.34 indexed citations
15.
Lawrence, Brian M.. (1984). The botanical and chemical aspects of oregano. 9(5). 41–51.75 indexed citations
16.
Lawrence, Brian M.. (1980). New trends in essential oils.. 5(4). 6–16.9 indexed citations
17.
Lawrence, Brian M.. (1978). A study of the monoterpene interrelationships in the genus mentha with special reference to the origin of pulegone and menthofuran. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).85 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.