Brian Drew
Impact in
-
- Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
- Medical Terminology top 10%
Papers in ⓘ
- Surgery 21
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 10
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 5
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 13
- Spinal Cord Injury Research 8
- Co-authors
- Michael G. Fehlings (9 shared papers)Brad Petrisor (4 shared papers)Henry Ahn (7 shared papers)D J Dick (1 shared paper)B. Catharine Craven (3 shared papers)Michelle Ghert (5 shared papers)Nathan Evaniew (6 shared papers)Mary C. Verrier (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Spine Journal (5 papers)Spine (4 papers)Journal of Neurotrauma (3 papers)Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques (2 papers)Spinal Cord (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Brian Drew
37 papers receiving 967 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 575
- Medical Terminology 5
- Surgery 521
- Emergency Medicine 109
- Rehabilitation 68
Countries citing papers authored by Brian Drew
This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Drew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Drew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Drew. The network helps show where Brian Drew may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 152 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 108 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 101 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 31 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 17 |
About Brian Drew
Brian Drew is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 994 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (13 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (10 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (8 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (5 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (3 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (3 papers) and Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (575 citations), Medical Terminology (5 citations), Surgery (521 citations), Emergency Medicine (109 citations) and Rehabilitation (68 citations). Brian Drew has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael G. Fehlings, Brad Petrisor, Henry Ahn, D J Dick, B. Catharine Craven, Michelle Ghert, Nathan Evaniew, Mary C. Verrier, Mohit Bhandari and Amresh Kumar Singh. Their work appears in journals such as The Spine Journal, Spine, Journal of Neurotrauma, Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques and Spinal Cord.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.