Mark E. Huang

1.5k total citations
41 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Mark E. Huang is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark E. Huang has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Surgery, 8 papers in Epidemiology and 8 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Mark E. Huang's work include Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (8 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (7 papers) and Management of metastatic bone disease (7 papers). Mark E. Huang is often cited by papers focused on Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (8 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (7 papers) and Management of metastatic bone disease (7 papers). Mark E. Huang collaborates with scholars based in United States, Singapore and New Zealand. Mark E. Huang's co-authors include David X. Cifu, Lori Keyser‐Marcus, William McKinley, James A. Sliwa, Virginia S. Nelson, Paul F. Pasquina, Phillip R. Bryant, Stephanie A. Kolakowsky‐Hayner, R. Norman Harden and Zachary L. McCormick and has published in prestigious journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Journal of Applied Polymer Science and Journal of Neurotrauma.

In The Last Decade

Mark E. Huang

40 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark E. Huang United States 19 466 210 207 181 178 41 1.1k
Jacques DʼAstous United States 24 600 1.3× 79 0.4× 98 0.5× 105 0.6× 57 0.3× 54 1.7k
Robert Goodkin United States 27 1.4k 2.9× 171 0.8× 114 0.6× 598 3.3× 73 0.4× 70 2.4k
Christopher M. Modlesky United States 26 373 0.8× 38 0.2× 47 0.2× 295 1.6× 162 0.9× 76 2.0k
Norman W. Gill United States 17 571 1.2× 38 0.2× 53 0.3× 249 1.4× 99 0.6× 40 1.4k
Jeffrey Voigt United States 22 368 0.8× 105 0.5× 85 0.4× 28 0.2× 36 0.2× 49 1.2k
Aidan Cosgrove United Kingdom 28 627 1.3× 54 0.3× 176 0.9× 90 0.5× 195 1.1× 62 2.5k
Rainer Abel Germany 24 952 2.0× 73 0.3× 79 0.4× 1.0k 5.7× 293 1.6× 88 1.8k
Ola Thorsson Sweden 25 534 1.1× 179 0.9× 21 0.1× 33 0.2× 543 3.1× 79 2.0k
Joanne Borg‐Stein United States 23 850 1.8× 39 0.2× 36 0.2× 155 0.9× 318 1.8× 75 2.1k
John M. Mazur United States 20 823 1.8× 54 0.3× 48 0.2× 177 1.0× 254 1.4× 45 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Huang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Huang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Huang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Huang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Huang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Huang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Huang. The network helps show where Mark E. Huang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark E. Huang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark E. Huang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark E. Huang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark E. Huang. Mark E. Huang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Huang, Mark E., et al.. (2016). Merit‐Based Incentive Payment System: Preparing Your Practice for Upcoming Change. PM&R. 8(8). 792–797. 1 indexed citations
2.
Sliwa, James A., et al.. (2015). Cancer Rehabilitation: Do Functional Gains Relate to 60 Percent Rule Classification or to the Presence of Metastasis?. PM&R. 8(2). 131–137. 15 indexed citations
4.
Huang, Mark E.. (2014). Meaningful Use: An Update for Physiatry Practices. PM&R. 6(5). 437–441. 1 indexed citations
5.
Huang, Mark E., et al.. (2014). Pediatric Acute Hematogenous Osteomyelitis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 35(6). 634–639. 52 indexed citations
6.
Huang, Mark E. & James A. Sliwa. (2011). Inpatient Rehabilitation of Patients with Cancer: Efficacy and Treatment Considerations. PM&R. 3(8). 746–757. 41 indexed citations
7.
Leigh, Warren, et al.. (2010). Pediatric Calcaneal Osteomyelitis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 30(8). 888–892. 19 indexed citations
8.
Huang, Mark E., et al.. (2009). Inpatient Rehabilitation of Survivors of Purpura Fulminans With Multiple Limb Amputations: A Case Series. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 90(4). 696–700. 3 indexed citations
9.
Pasquina, Paul F., et al.. (2006). Advances in Amputee Care. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 87(3). 34–43. 60 indexed citations
10.
Huang, Mark E., et al.. (2006). Limb Deficiency and Prosthetic Management. 3. Complex Limb Deficiency. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 87(3). 15–20. 7 indexed citations
11.
Huang, Mark E., et al.. (2006). Limb Deficiency and Prosthetic Management. 2. Aging With Limb Loss. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 87(3). 10–14. 9 indexed citations
12.
Nelson, Virginia S., et al.. (2006). Limb Deficiency and Prosthetic Management. 1. Decision Making in Prosthetic Prescription and Management. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 87(3). 3–9. 39 indexed citations
13.
Pasquina, Paul F., et al.. (2006). Limb Deficiency and Prosthetic Management. 4. Comorbidities Associated With Limb Loss. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 87(3). 21–27. 17 indexed citations
14.
Seel, Ronald T., Mark E. Huang, David X. Cifu, Stephanie A. Kolakowsky‐Hayner, & William McKinley. (2001). Age-Related Differences In Length Of Stays, Hospitalization Costs, And Outcomes For An Injury-Matched Sample Of Adults With Paraplegia. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 24(4). 241–250. 39 indexed citations
15.
Huang, Mark E., et al.. (2001). Functional outcomes and quality of life in patients with brain tumors: A preliminary report. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 82(11). 1540–1546. 88 indexed citations
16.
Huang, Mark E., David X. Cifu, & Lori Keyser‐Marcus. (2000). Functional Outcomes in Patients with Brain Tumor after Inpatient Rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 79(4). 327–335. 88 indexed citations
17.
McKinley, William, et al.. (2000). Neoplastic vs. Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 79(2). 138–144. 59 indexed citations
18.
Cifu, David X., Mark E. Huang, Stephanie A. Kolakowsky‐Hayner, & Ron Seel. (1999). Age, Outcome, and Rehabilitation Costs after Paraplegia Caused by Traumatic Injury of the Thoracic Spinal Cord, Conus Medullaris, and Cauda Equina. Journal of Neurotrauma. 16(9). 805–815. 50 indexed citations
19.
McKinley, William, et al.. (1999). Neoplastic versus traumatic spinal cord injury: An outcome comparison after inpatient rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 80(10). 1253–1257. 48 indexed citations
20.
Huang, Mark E., David X. Cifu, & Lori Keyser‐Marcus. (1998). Functional outcome after brain tumor and acute stroke: A comparative analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 79(11). 1386–1390. 102 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026