Brian Day

22 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

Brian Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Algebra and Number Theory 131
  • Mathematical Physics 218
  • Geometry and Topology 194
  • Human-Computer Interaction 45
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 92
Replace Niels O. Nygaard with:
Niels O. Nygaard United States
Robert L. Snider United States
Chen-Ping Yu United States
Amy N. Yates United States
Emmanuel Amiot France
Myriam Desainte‐Catherine France
Deepali Aneja United States
Bonnie Lynn Nash-Webber United States
Jon Gunderson United States
Jelena Božek Croatia
Brian Day relative to Niels O. Nygaard United States Niels O. Nygaard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Niels O. Nygaard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Day. The network helps show where Brian Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Day Line = papers co-authored together Brian Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997112
2 197267
3 201836
4 201525
5 200322
6 202219
7 201716
8 197314
9 201313
10 200312
11 198012
12 19898
13 20148
14 19958
15 19866
16 20216
17
Preference formation in choice experiments (CE): task awareness and learning in the cognitive process.
20046
18 19903
19 20153
20
Some Experiences of Data Centre Relocation.
19871

About Brian Day

Brian Day is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 24 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (10 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (8 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (6 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (5 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers) and Sport Psychology and Performance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (131 citations), Mathematical Physics (218 citations), Geometry and Topology (194 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (45 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (92 citations). Brian Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ross Street, Jeffrey B. Wagman, Christopher C. Pagano, Elham Ebrahimi, Sabarish V. Babu, Peter J. Smith, Andrew Robb, Francis Borceux, Brandon J. Thomas and Dawn M. McBride. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Perception, Acta Psychologica, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and Behavior Research Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact