Troy E. McEwan

2.5k total citations
82 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Troy E. McEwan is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Troy E. McEwan has authored 82 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 61 papers in Clinical Psychology, 59 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 34 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Troy E. McEwan's work include Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (35 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (33 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (28 papers). Troy E. McEwan is often cited by papers focused on Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (35 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (33 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (28 papers). Troy E. McEwan collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Sweden. Troy E. McEwan's co-authors include James R. P. Ogloff, Rachel MacKenzie, Paul E. Mullen, Rosemary Purcell, Melanie Simmons, Susanne Strand, Michele Pathé, Stefan Luebbers, David James and P.E. Mullen and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Psychological Medicine and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Troy E. McEwan

77 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Troy E. McEwan Australia 25 1.2k 1.1k 534 170 93 82 1.6k
Mónica M. Gerber United Kingdom 15 234 0.2× 375 0.3× 108 0.2× 92 0.5× 13 0.1× 33 750
Lin Huff‐Corzine United States 20 292 0.2× 744 0.7× 317 0.6× 56 0.3× 7 0.1× 41 1.1k
Christina Mancini United States 21 580 0.5× 950 0.9× 134 0.3× 64 0.4× 22 0.2× 57 1.2k
Mathew D. Marques Australia 15 306 0.3× 525 0.5× 95 0.2× 69 0.4× 10 0.1× 43 824
Edgardo Miranda‐Zapata Chile 18 178 0.2× 310 0.3× 53 0.1× 353 2.1× 49 0.5× 76 923
Teresa Braga Portugal 9 312 0.3× 221 0.2× 187 0.4× 111 0.7× 5 0.1× 20 486
David Moreno Ruiz Spain 18 451 0.4× 197 0.2× 146 0.3× 641 3.8× 43 0.5× 43 977
David Brownfield Canada 14 279 0.2× 786 0.7× 223 0.4× 179 1.1× 29 0.3× 32 1.0k
Magali Dufour Canada 18 673 0.6× 343 0.3× 31 0.1× 73 0.4× 11 0.1× 72 987
Nigel Long New Zealand 19 512 0.4× 180 0.2× 75 0.1× 136 0.8× 7 0.1× 46 988

Countries citing papers authored by Troy E. McEwan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Troy E. McEwan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Troy E. McEwan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Troy E. McEwan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Troy E. McEwan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Troy E. McEwan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Troy E. McEwan. The network helps show where Troy E. McEwan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Troy E. McEwan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Troy E. McEwan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Troy E. McEwan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Troy E. McEwan. Troy E. McEwan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Spivak, Benjamin, et al.. (2025). Mental healthcare use of women who perpetrate intimate partner abuse: A case-linkage study. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 59(12). 1106–1114.
2.
McEwan, Troy E., et al.. (2024). Assessing risk among women who perpetrate intimate partner abuse. Psychology Crime and Law. 32(2). 367–393.
3.
Shepherd, Stephane M., et al.. (2024). Hidden numbers, hidden people: Family violence among South Asian Australians. Journal of Population Research. 41(2).
5.
McEwan, Troy E., et al.. (2023). Characteristics of Young People who use Family Violence in Adolescence and Young Adulthood: An Age-based Analysis. Journal of Family Violence. 39(5). 849–860. 2 indexed citations
6.
Simmons, Melanie, et al.. (2023). The Role of Situational Factors in Child-to-Parent Abuse: Implications for Assessment, Management, and Intervention. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 69(6-7). 743–761. 6 indexed citations
7.
Pathé, Michele, et al.. (2022). The role of grievance in fatal family violence and implications for the construct of lone actor grievance-fuelled violence. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 1057719–1057719. 3 indexed citations
8.
Papalia, Nina, et al.. (2022). Exploring the utility of the YLS/CMI for Australian youth in custody according to child protection history.. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 28(4). 616–629. 4 indexed citations
9.
Ogloff, James R. P., et al.. (2020). Firesetting among People with Mental Disorders: Differences in Diagnosis, Motives and Behaviour. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 20(2). 118–132. 4 indexed citations
10.
McEwan, Troy E., et al.. (2018). The Development of the VP-SAFvR: An Actuarial Instrument for Police Triage of Australian Family Violence Reports. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 46(4). 590–607. 23 indexed citations
11.
McEwan, Troy E., Susanne Strand, Rachel MacKenzie, & David James. (2017). Screening Assessment for Stalking and Harassment (SASH): guidelines for application and interpretation. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 3 indexed citations
12.
McEwan, Troy E., et al.. (2017). A comparison of psychopathology and reoffending in female and male convicted firesetters.. Law and Human Behavior. 41(6). 588–599. 15 indexed citations
13.
McEwan, Troy E., et al.. (2013). Comparing the characteristics of firesetting and non-firesetting offenders: are firesetters a special case?. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 24(5). 549–569. 22 indexed citations
14.
Strand, Susanne & Troy E. McEwan. (2011). Violence among female stalkers. Psychological Medicine. 42(3). 545–555. 37 indexed citations
15.
McEwan, Troy E., Michele Pathé, & James R. P. Ogloff. (2011). Advances in stalking risk assessment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 29(2). 180–201. 28 indexed citations
16.
MacKenzie, Rachel, et al.. (2010). Stalkers and intelligence: implications for treatment. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 21(6). 852–872. 9 indexed citations
17.
McEwan, Troy E., Michael R. Davis, Rachel MacKenzie, & Paul E. Mullen. (2009). The effects of social desirability response bias on STAXI‐2 profiles in a clinical forensic sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 48(4). 431–436. 35 indexed citations
18.
McEwan, Troy E., P.E. Mullen, Rachel MacKenzie, & James R. P. Ogloff. (2009). Violence in stalking situations. Psychological Medicine. 39(9). 1469–1478. 69 indexed citations
19.
MacKenzie, Rachel, Paul E. Mullen, James R. P. Ogloff, Troy E. McEwan, & David James. (2008). Parental Bonding and Adult Attachment Styles in Different Types of Stalker*. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 53(6). 1443–1449. 32 indexed citations
20.
McEwan, Troy E., Paul E. Mullen, & Rosemary Purcell. (2006). Identifying risk factors in stalking: A review of current research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 30(1). 1–9. 73 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026