Brian Arbogast
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Analytical Chemistry top 10%
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Max L. DeinzerJ. A. LaraméeMichael O. GlockerJolanda SchreursDebra BerryJames W. EichelbergerWilliam L. BuddeElizabeth A. Stemmler
- Topics
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (13 papers)Analytical chemistry methods development (6 papers)Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyRussia
In The Last Decade
Brian Arbogast
27 papers receiving 516 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Spectroscopy 203
- Molecular Biology 195
- Analytical Chemistry 62
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 59
- Epidemiology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Brian Arbogast
This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Arbogast's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Arbogast with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Arbogast more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Arbogast
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Arbogast. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Arbogast. The network helps show where Brian Arbogast may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian Arbogast
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian Arbogast. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian Arbogast based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brian Arbogast. Brian Arbogast is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | Retinal proteomic changes under different ischemic conditions - implication of an epigenetic regulatory mechanism. | 16 |
| 4 | 38 | |
| 5 | 57 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 46 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 62 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Brian Arbogast
Brian Arbogast is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Analytical Chemistry and Toxicology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (6 papers) and Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (203 citations), Analytical Chemistry (62 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (59 citations). Brian Arbogast has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Max L. Deinzer, J. A. Laramée, Michael O. Glocker, Jolanda Schreurs, Debra Berry, James W. Eichelberger, William L. Budde, Elizabeth A. Stemmler, Ralph C. Dougherty and Ronald A. Hites. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Analytical Chemistry and Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.