Bret W. Davis
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
- Violence, Religion, and Philosophy
-
- Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Papers in
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 7
- Political Theology and Sovereignty 2
- Critical Theory and Philosophy 2
- Philosophy 12
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 8
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 4
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 2
- Co-authors
- Toru Shoji (1 shared paper)Ning Li (1 shared paper)Anne E. Allan (1 shared paper)Jag Bhawan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Contemporary Buddhism (1 paper)American Journal of Dermatopathology (1 paper)Philosophy East and West (1 paper)The Journal of Nietzsche Studies (2 papers)Research in Phenomenology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Bret W. Davis
18 papers receiving 130 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Philosophy 85
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
- History and Philosophy of Science 11
- Religious studies 12
- Cultural Studies 12
Countries citing papers authored by Bret W. Davis
This map shows the geographic impact of Bret W. Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bret W. Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bret W. Davis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bret W. Davis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bret W. Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bret W. Davis. The network helps show where Bret W. Davis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Bret W. Davis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 40 | |
| 2 | Heidegger and the Will: On the Way to Gelassenheit | 2007 | 35 |
| 3 | Martin Heidegger: Key Concepts | 2014 | 25 |
| 4 | 2001 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 1 |
About Bret W. Davis
Bret W. Davis is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cultural Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 27 papers that have together received 161 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (9 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (8 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (7 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (4 papers), Japanese History and Culture (3 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers) and Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (85 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (62 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations), Religious studies (12 citations) and Cultural Studies (12 citations). Bret W. Davis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Toru Shoji, Ning Li, Anne E. Allan and Jag Bhawan. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Buddhism, American Journal of Dermatopathology, Philosophy East and West, The Journal of Nietzsche Studies and Research in Phenomenology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.