Brendan Hallam

526 total citations
9 papers, 159 citations indexed

About

Brendan Hallam is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Brendan Hallam has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 159 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 3 papers in General Health Professions and 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Brendan Hallam's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Sleep and related disorders (2 papers). Brendan Hallam is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Sleep and related disorders (2 papers). Brendan Hallam collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Brendan Hallam's co-authors include Claudia Cooper, Jonathan Huntley, Gill Livingston, Sergi G. Costafreda, Rohan Bhome, Justin Chan, Kirsi M. Kinnunen, Lucy Webster, Colin A. Espie and Penny Rapaport and has published in prestigious journals such as Neurobiology of Aging, Health Technology Assessment and International Psychogeriatrics.

In The Last Decade

Brendan Hallam

8 papers receiving 157 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Brendan Hallam United Kingdom 7 94 78 42 28 20 9 159
Shanpeng Li China 5 98 1.0× 34 0.4× 34 0.8× 63 2.3× 21 1.1× 13 201
Rita Shapiro United States 7 98 1.0× 37 0.5× 32 0.8× 16 0.6× 18 0.9× 10 245
Shannon Finley United States 5 129 1.4× 30 0.4× 52 1.2× 32 1.1× 30 1.5× 10 208
Matthew H. Iveson United Kingdom 8 32 0.3× 43 0.6× 45 1.1× 33 1.2× 11 0.6× 33 205
Cristina Buiza Spain 8 73 0.8× 40 0.5× 23 0.5× 24 0.9× 40 2.0× 16 172
Sabine Jansen Germany 5 176 1.9× 129 1.7× 18 0.4× 19 0.7× 32 1.6× 6 258
Elissa Asp Canada 7 81 0.9× 22 0.3× 68 1.6× 17 0.6× 10 0.5× 9 280
Tanisha G. Hill‐Jarrett United States 7 31 0.3× 21 0.3× 27 0.6× 11 0.4× 11 0.6× 25 133
Amal Harrati United States 9 78 0.8× 24 0.3× 19 0.5× 33 1.2× 27 1.4× 21 244
David Ogez Canada 8 76 0.8× 30 0.4× 55 1.3× 33 1.2× 30 1.5× 42 257

Countries citing papers authored by Brendan Hallam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brendan Hallam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brendan Hallam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brendan Hallam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brendan Hallam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brendan Hallam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brendan Hallam. The network helps show where Brendan Hallam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brendan Hallam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brendan Hallam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brendan Hallam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brendan Hallam. Brendan Hallam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
2.
Hallam, Brendan, Jessica Rees, Irene Petersen, et al.. (2021). How are people with mild cognitive impairment or subjective memory complaints managed in primary care? A systematic review. Family Practice. 38(5). 669–683. 6 indexed citations
3.
Ledden, Sarah, Luke Sheridan Rains, Merle Schlief, et al.. (2021). Current state of the evidence on community treatments for people with complex emotional needs: a scoping review. medRxiv. 2 indexed citations
4.
Hallam, Brendan, Justin Chan, Sergi G. Costafreda, Rohan Bhome, & Jonathan Huntley. (2020). What are the neural correlates of meta-cognition and anosognosia in Alzheimer's disease? A systematic review. Neurobiology of Aging. 94. 250–264. 41 indexed citations
5.
Polacsek, Meg, Anita Goh, Sue Malta, et al.. (2019). ‘I know they are not trained in dementia’: Addressing the need for specialist dementia training for home care workers. Health & Social Care in the Community. 28(2). 475–484. 43 indexed citations
6.
Kinnunen, Kirsi M., Penny Rapaport, Lucy Webster, et al.. (2018). A manual-based intervention for carers of people with dementia and sleep disturbances: an acceptability and feasibility RCT. Health Technology Assessment. 22(71). 1–408. 7 indexed citations
7.
Livingston, Gill, Julie Barber, Kirsi M. Kinnunen, et al.. (2018). DREAMS-START (Dementia RElAted Manual for Sleep; STrAtegies for RelaTives) for people with dementia and sleep disturbances: a single-blind feasibility and acceptability randomized controlled trial. International Psychogeriatrics. 31(2). 251–265. 36 indexed citations
8.
Goh, Anita, et al.. (2018). An update on dementia training programmes in home and community care. Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 31(5). 417–423. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026