This map shows the geographic impact of Boris Mlačić's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Boris Mlačić with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boris Mlačić more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Boris Mlačić. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Boris Mlačić. The network helps show where Boris Mlačić may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Boris Mlačić
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Boris Mlačić.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Boris Mlačić based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Boris Mlačić. Boris Mlačić is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Raad, Boele De, Dick P. H. Barelds, Boris Mlačić, et al.. (2018). Take 2 personality factors: A study of two fundamental ways of trait differentiation in eleven trait taxonomies. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(1). 39–55.8 indexed citations
4.
Mlačić, Boris. (2016). Social and reputational aspects of personality. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(1). 15–36.6 indexed citations
5.
Mikloušić, Igor, Boris Mlačić, & Goran Milas. (2016). Construct validity of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire using self and peer ratings in Croatia. 96.
Mlačić, Boris, et al.. (2014). The Big-Five Model of Personality and the Success of High School Students in Physical Education. Croatian Journal of Education - Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje. 16(2). 471–490.5 indexed citations
Trninić, Slavko, Igor Kardum, & Boris Mlačić. (2010). Hipotetski model specifičnih osobina vrhunskih sportaša u momčadskim sportskim igrama. University of Zagreb University Computing Centre (SRCE). 19(3). 463–485.
12.
Mlačić, Boris, et al.. (2008). The Development of Croatian Markers for the Big-Five Personality Model. Drustvena istrazivanja. 17. 223–246.4 indexed citations
13.
Mlačić, Boris, et al.. (2007). ADOLESCENT PERSONALITY AND SELF-ESTEEM – AN ANALYSIS OF SELF-REPORTS AND PARENTAL-RATINGS. Drustvena istrazivanja. 16. 213–236.16 indexed citations
Mlačić, Boris. (2002). Factor Structure of Self and Peer Ratings with Goldberg's Markers. Drustvena istrazivanja. 11. 23–46.1 indexed citations
16.
Franc, Renata, et al.. (2002). Self-expresses tendency of adolescents towards social deviations and antisocial behaviour. Drustvena istrazivanja. 11. 265–289.1 indexed citations
17.
Mlačić, Boris. (2002). The Lexical Approach in Personality Psychology: A Review of Personality Descriptive Taxonomies. Drustvena istrazivanja. 11. 553–576.4 indexed citations
18.
Mlačić, Boris. (2002). LEKSIČKI PRISTUP U PSIHOLOGIJI LIČNOSTI: PREGLED TAKSONOMIJA OPISIVAČA OSOBINA LIČNOSTI. Drustvena istrazivanja. 11. 553–576.1 indexed citations
19.
Mlačić, Boris, et al.. (2000). UTJECAJ RASPOREDA ČESTICA NA FAKTORSKU STRUKTURU I SKALNE REZULTATE GOLDBERGOVIH MARKERA: PRILOG MEĐUKULTURALNOJ VALIDACIJI VELEPETOROG MODELA LIČNOSTI. Drustvena istrazivanja. 9. 633–661.2 indexed citations
20.
Mlačić, Boris, et al.. (1997). STRUKTURA I RELACIJE BIG-FIVE MARKERA I EYSENCKOVA UPITNIKA LiČNOSTI: EMPIRIJSKA USPOREDBA DVAJU STRUKTURALNIH MODELA LIČNOSTI. Drustvena istrazivanja. 6(1). 1–21.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.