Bong-Suk Choi
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Kumar SapkotaSeung KimHyo‐Jeong LeeSe‐Eun ParkSung-Jun KimChun‐Sung KimJae‐Sung KimSung Jun Kim
- Topics
- Enzyme Production and Characterization (6 papers)Fungal Biology and Applications (5 papers)Microbial Metabolism and Applications (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryInternational Journal of Molecular SciencesProcess Biochemistry
- Partner nations
- South KoreaNepalUnited States
In The Last Decade
Bong-Suk Choi
15 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Biotechnology 239
- Molecular Biology 220
- Plant Science 123
- Pharmacology 101
- Complementary and alternative medicine 71
Countries citing papers authored by Bong-Suk Choi
This map shows the geographic impact of Bong-Suk Choi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bong-Suk Choi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bong-Suk Choi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bong-Suk Choi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bong-Suk Choi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bong-Suk Choi. The network helps show where Bong-Suk Choi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bong-Suk Choi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bong-Suk Choi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bong-Suk Choi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bong-Suk Choi. Bong-Suk Choi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 36 | |
| 5 | 52 | |
| 6 | 49 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 56 | |
| 15 | Purification, characterization, and cloning of fibrinolytic metalloprotease from Pleurotus ostreatus mycelia. | 26 |
| 16 | A fibrinolytic enzyme from the medicinal mushroom Cordyceps militaris. | 64 |
About Bong-Suk Choi
Bong-Suk Choi is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Pharmacology and Biochemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 441 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Enzyme Production and Characterization (6 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (5 papers) and Microbial Metabolism and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (239 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (71 citations) and Pharmacology (101 citations). Bong-Suk Choi has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, Nepal and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kumar Sapkota, Seung Kim, Hyo‐Jeong Lee, Se‐Eun Park, Sung-Jun Kim, Chun‐Sung Kim, Jae‐Sung Kim, Sung Jun Kim, Sung-Jun Kim and Hyun‐Hwa Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Process Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.