Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Blanche Geer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Blanche Geer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Blanche Geer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Blanche Geer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Blanche Geer. The network helps show where Blanche Geer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Blanche Geer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Blanche Geer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Blanche Geer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Blanche Geer. Blanche Geer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Becker, Howard S., Blanche Geer, David Riesman, & Robert S. Weiss. (2017). Institutions and the Person.21 indexed citations
2.
Becker, Howard S., Blanche Geer, & Everett C. Hughes. (2017). Making the Grade.4 indexed citations
3.
Becker, Howard S., Blanche Geer, David Riesman, & Robert S. Weiss. (2009). Institutions and the Person: Festschrift in Honor of Everett C.Hughes.5 indexed citations
Geer, Blanche. (1972). The Story of the Project. American Behavioral Scientist. 16(1). 3–14.1 indexed citations
7.
Wegner, Eldon L., Howard S. Becker, Blanche Geer, & Everett C. Hughes. (1969). Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life.. American Sociological Review. 34(4). 591–591.227 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Becker, Howard S., et al.. (1969). Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life. AAUP Bulletin. 55(1). 106–106.196 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Peterson, Charles E., Howard S. Becker, Blanche Geer, & Everett C. Hughes. (1969). Making the Grade: The Academic Side of College Life. The Journal of Higher Education. 40(9). 746–746.69 indexed citations
Geer, Blanche & Eliot Freidson. (1964). The Hospital in Modern Society.. American Sociological Review. 29(3). 449–449.463 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Belknap, Ivan, Howard S. Becker, Blanche Geer, Everett C. Hughes, & Anselm Strauss. (1962). Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School.. Administrative Science Quarterly. 7(3). 368–368.778 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Reader, George G., Howard S. Becker, Blanche Geer, Everett C. Hughes, & Anselm L. Strauss. (1962). Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School.. American Sociological Review. 27(3). 418–418.384 indexed citations breakdown →
Becker, Howard S. & Blanche Geer. (1958). The Fate of Idealism in Medical School. American Sociological Review. 23(1). 50–50.145 indexed citations breakdown →
Becker, Howard S. & Blanche Geer. (1957). Participant Observation and Interviewing: A Comparison. Human Organization. 16(3). 28–32.344 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.