Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
196834.0k citationsBarney G. Glaser, Anselm L. Strauss et al.profile →
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
196827.9k citationsBarney G. Glaser, Anselm L. Strauss et al.Nursing Researchprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Anselm L. Strauss
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Anselm L. Strauss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anselm L. Strauss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anselm L. Strauss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anselm L. Strauss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anselm L. Strauss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anselm L. Strauss. The network helps show where Anselm L. Strauss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anselm L. Strauss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anselm L. Strauss.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anselm L. Strauss based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anselm L. Strauss. Anselm L. Strauss is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Glaser, Barney G., et al.. (2012). La découverte de la théorie ancrée : stratégies pour la recherche qualitative. Armand Colin eBooks.53 indexed citations
4.
Strauss, Anselm L., et al.. (2011). Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung : Datenanalyse und Theoriebildung in der empirischen soziologischen Forschung. Wilhelm Fink eBooks.113 indexed citations
5.
Strauss, Anselm L. & Juliet Corbin. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa: Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la teoría fundamentada.420 indexed citations
Strauss, Anselm L. & David R. Maines. (1991). Social organization and social process : essays in honor of Anselm Strauss. Medical Entomology and Zoology.312 indexed citations
9.
Strauss, Anselm L.. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press eBooks.8399 indexed citations breakdown →
Glaser, Barney G., et al.. (1968). The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research. Nursing Research. 17(4). 364–364.27870 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Glaser, Barney G. & Anselm L. Strauss. (1965). Dying on Time. Trans-action. 2(4). 27–31.10 indexed citations
16.
Mead, George H. & Anselm L. Strauss. (1964). On social psychology : selected papers. University of Chicago Press eBooks.79 indexed citations
17.
Strauss, Anselm L., et al.. (1964). THE NONACCOUNTABILITY OF TERMINAL CARE. REGULATIONS COVER THE 'WHAT' OF MEDICAL AND NURSING PROCEDURES BUT LEAVE OUT THE IMPORTANT 'HOW'.. PubMed. 38. 73–87.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.