Birgit Schwanke

1.4k citations
13 papers · 1.1k · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Birgit Schwanke

12 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Birgit Schwanke
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Developmental Neuroscience 133
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 536
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 242
  • Neurology 84
  • Cell Biology 141
Replace Tetsushi Sadakata with:
Tetsushi Sadakata Japan
Michael R. Akins United States
Hiroyuki Ichijo Japan
Martijn P. J. Dekkers Switzerland
Ora Ohana Germany
Frédéric Gambino France
Mio Nonaka Japan
Ivan Galimberti Switzerland
Natalia V. De Marco García United States
Massimiliano Aceti United States
Birgit Schwanke relative to Tetsushi Sadakata Japan Tetsushi Sadakata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Tetsushi Sadakata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Birgit Schwanke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Birgit Schwanke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Birgit Schwanke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Birgit Schwanke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Birgit Schwanke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Birgit Schwanke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Birgit Schwanke. The network helps show where Birgit Schwanke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Birgit Schwanke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Birgit Schwanke Line = papers co-authored together Birgit Schwanke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1995596
2 1999155
3 2018124
4 202242
5 199038
6 201730
7 201626
8 201623
9 201921
10 202217
11 20248
12 20226
13 20230

About Birgit Schwanke

Birgit Schwanke is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA Research and Splicing (5 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (3 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (2 papers), Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (2 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers) and Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (133 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (536 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (242 citations), Neurology (84 citations) and Cell Biology (141 citations). Birgit Schwanke has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Uwe Frey, Uwe Konietzko, Manfred G. Krug, Wolfgang Link, Dietmar Kuhl, Gunther Kauselmann, Craig Curtis Garner, Stefan Kindler, Dietmar Richter and Monika Rehbein. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Reports, Molecular Psychiatry, Journal of Neuroscience, Science Advances and Nucleic Acids Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact