Bing‐Bing Cao

663 citations
25 papers · 500 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Bing‐Bing Cao

22 papers receiving 490 citations

Peers

Bing‐Bing Cao
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Management Information Systems 239
  • Strategy and Management 266
  • Marketing 110
  • Information Systems 247
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 44
Replace Jingchen Liu with:
Jingchen Liu China
Fasheng Xu United States
Jingyao Wang China
Yao Cui United States
Rachita Gupta India
Zihao Mu China
Vincenzo Varriale Italy
Jun‐Yeon Lee United States
Gu Pang United Kingdom
Tana Siqin Hong Kong
Bing‐Bing Cao relative to Jingchen Liu China Jingchen Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jingchen Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bing‐Bing Cao

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bing‐Bing Cao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bing‐Bing Cao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bing‐Bing Cao more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bing‐Bing Cao

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bing‐Bing Cao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bing‐Bing Cao. The network helps show where Bing‐Bing Cao may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Bing‐Bing Cao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bing‐Bing Cao Line = papers co-authored together Bing‐Bing Cao links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020181
2 2021159
3 202226
4 201925
5 202017
6 202211
7 201711
8 202410
9 20248
10 20166
11 20206
12 20216
13 20175
14 20205
15 20185
16 20174
17 20243
18 20253
19 20243
20 20173

About Bing‐Bing Cao

Bing‐Bing Cao is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Marketing, Strategy and Management, Management Science and Operations Research and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 25 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Supply Chain and Inventory Management (12 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (7 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (5 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (3 papers), Maritime Ports and Logistics (3 papers), Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability (2 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (2 papers) and Environmental Sustainability in Business (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (239 citations), Strategy and Management (266 citations), Marketing (110 citations), Information Systems (247 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (44 citations). Bing‐Bing Cao has collaborated with scholars based in China, Denmark and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Zhi‐Ping Fan, Xue‐Yan Wu, Carol Xiaojuan Ou, Xin Li, Meifei Zhu, Hongping Yuan, Hongyan Li, Wenwen Chen, Tianhui You and Feng Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, International Journal of Production Research, Sustainability, Expert Systems with Applications and International Journal of Production Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact