Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization

14.0k citations
2.1k papers · indexed · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization

1.8k papers receiving 12.6k citations

Peers

Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
  • Computational Mathematics 274
  • Numerical Analysis 2.3k
  • Management Information Systems 3.3k
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 2.1k
  • Management Science and Operations Research 2.4k
Replace International Statistical Review with:
International Statistical Review United States
Optimization Letters China
Journal of Computational Science China
Computing Germany
INFORMS journal on computing United States
Journal of Computer and System Sciences United States
Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics United States
Computational Optimization and Applications United States
Optimization China
Mathematical Methods of Operations Research Germany
Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization relative to International Statistical Review United States International Statistical Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
International Statistical Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization.

About Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization

The 2.1k papers published in Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization in the last decades have received a total of 14.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization usually cover Computational Mathematics (49 papers), Numerical Analysis (339 papers), Management Information Systems (495 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (453 papers) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (296 papers) specifically the topics of Supply Chain and Inventory Management (377 papers), Optimization and Variational Analysis (345 papers), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (317 papers), Sustainable Supply Chain Management (273 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (155 papers), Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (149 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (147 papers) and Optimization and Mathematical Programming (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization are Harish Garg, Kok Lay Teo, Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, Gerhard‐Wilhelm Weber, Ryan Loxton, Song Wang, David Yang Gao, Qun Lin, Sankar Kumar Roy and Magfura Pervin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact