Bimal D. M. Theophilus
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology top 10%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Organic Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Theresa LathamGregory A. GrabowskiF I SmithChristopher M. ThomasFrances I. SmithChristopher A. SmithMichael CrossF. G. H. Hill
- Topics
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (5 papers)Platelet Disorders and Treatments (5 papers)Hemophilia Treatment and Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Bimal D. M. Theophilus
21 papers receiving 614 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Molecular Biology 355
- Physiology 317
- Cell Biology 209
- Genetics 179
- Organic Chemistry 148
Countries citing papers authored by Bimal D. M. Theophilus
This map shows the geographic impact of Bimal D. M. Theophilus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bimal D. M. Theophilus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bimal D. M. Theophilus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bimal D. M. Theophilus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bimal D. M. Theophilus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bimal D. M. Theophilus. The network helps show where Bimal D. M. Theophilus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bimal D. M. Theophilus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bimal D. M. Theophilus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bimal D. M. Theophilus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bimal D. M. Theophilus. Bimal D. M. Theophilus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Novel characterization of a breakpoint in F8 | 3 |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | A new (K1518E) candidate mutation detected by universal heteroduplex generator analysis in a patient with type 2A (phenotype IIA) von Willebrand disease. | 3 |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | Fundamentals of the polymerase chain reaction: a future in clinical diagnostics? | 8 |
| 14 | 81 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | Complex alleles of the acid beta-glucosidase gene in Gaucher disease. | 99 |
| 17 | 102 | |
| 18 | 46 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 66 |
About Bimal D. M. Theophilus
Bimal D. M. Theophilus is a scholar working on Hematology, Molecular Medicine and Genetics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 630 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (5 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (5 papers) and Hemophilia Treatment and Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (67 citations), Cell Biology (209 citations) and Physiology (317 citations). Bimal D. M. Theophilus has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Theresa Latham, Gregory A. Grabowski, F I Smith, Christopher M. Thomas, Frances I. Smith, Christopher A. Smith, Michael Cross, F. G. H. Hill, M. S. Enayat and Michael D. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Gene and Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.