Bhavik K. Pathak
- Marketing top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ram D. GopalFang YinRobert GarfinkelRajkumar VenkatesanAmy Z. ZengAvinash TripathiSudip BhattacharjeeShailendra Palvia
- Topics
- Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (7 papers)Digital Marketing and Social Media (5 papers)Auction Theory and Applications (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Bhavik K. Pathak
12 papers receiving 410 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Marketing 208
- Sociology and Political Science 155
- Information Systems 132
- Management Science and Operations Research 86
- Information Systems and Management 85
Countries citing papers authored by Bhavik K. Pathak
This map shows the geographic impact of Bhavik K. Pathak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bhavik K. Pathak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bhavik K. Pathak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bhavik K. Pathak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bhavik K. Pathak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bhavik K. Pathak. The network helps show where Bhavik K. Pathak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bhavik K. Pathak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bhavik K. Pathak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bhavik K. Pathak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bhavik K. Pathak. Bhavik K. Pathak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Study of e-Learning Outcomes: The Role of Late-Registration and Self-Selection. | 2 |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | A Survey of the Comparison Shopping Agent-Based Decision Support Systems | 17 |
| 6 | 239 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 56 |
About Bhavik K. Pathak
Bhavik K. Pathak is a scholar working on Marketing, Computer Science Applications and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 13 papers that have together received 448 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (7 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (5 papers) and Auction Theory and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (208 citations), Information Systems and Management (85 citations) and Management Information Systems (74 citations). Bhavik K. Pathak has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ram D. Gopal, Fang Yin, Robert Garfinkel, Rajkumar Venkatesan, Amy Z. Zeng, Avinash Tripathi, Sudip Bhattacharjee and Shailendra Palvia. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Retailing, Journal of Management Information Systems and Decision Support Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.