B.H. Kiepper

611 total citations
30 papers, 441 citations indexed

About

B.H. Kiepper is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Food Science. According to data from OpenAlex, B.H. Kiepper has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 441 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 6 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and 6 papers in Food Science. Recurrent topics in B.H. Kiepper's work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (13 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers). B.H. Kiepper is often cited by papers focused on Animal Nutrition and Physiology (13 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (5 papers). B.H. Kiepper collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. B.H. Kiepper's co-authors include Casey W. Ritz, R. Jeff Buhr, Brian B. Oakley, M.E. Berrang, Gary L. Hawkins, N.A. Cox, Bruce S. Seal, Keshav C. Das, Kelli L. Hiett and Michael J. Rothrock and has published in prestigious journals such as Molecules, Renewable Energy and Poultry Science.

In The Last Decade

B.H. Kiepper

28 papers receiving 434 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
B.H. Kiepper United States	11	204	140	118	53	53	30	441
Maria Luz Prieto Ireland	7	131 0.6×	101 0.7×	244 2.1×	40 0.8×	12 0.2×	8	486
Ankit Hinsu India	11	168 0.8×	88 0.6×	203 1.7×	17 0.3×	13 0.2×	28	514
Kirsten Mooijman Netherlands	10	60 0.3×	228 1.6×	110 0.9×	64 1.2×	160 3.0×	17	590
Hideyuki Ohmori Japan	14	78 0.4×	134 1.0×	212 1.8×	120 2.3×	16 0.3×	39	621
Rajesh Lalloo South Africa	11	123 0.6×	116 0.8×	114 1.0×	9 0.2×	16 0.3×	21	518
P. Konieczny Poland	11	150 0.7×	248 1.8×	84 0.7×	8 0.2×	34 0.6×	55	485
Agnes Weiß Germany	15	87 0.4×	241 1.7×	201 1.7×	111 2.1×	12 0.2×	42	696
Santosh Ramchuran South Africa	16	74 0.4×	94 0.7×	178 1.5×	15 0.3×	17 0.3×	35	611
Minna Kahala Finland	14	63 0.3×	331 2.4×	318 2.7×	146 2.8×	25 0.5×	34	714

Countries citing papers authored by B.H. Kiepper

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B.H. Kiepper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B.H. Kiepper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B.H. Kiepper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B.H. Kiepper

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B.H. Kiepper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B.H. Kiepper. The network helps show where B.H. Kiepper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B.H. Kiepper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B.H. Kiepper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B.H. Kiepper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B.H. Kiepper. B.H. Kiepper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Schwean-Lardner, K., T.G. Crowe, Wayne Daley, et al.. (2023). Alternative slaughter procedures: on-farm slaughter and transport system for broilers. Poultry Science. 102(12). 103137–103137.

Buhr, R.J., et al.. (2023). Impact of stunning method on blood loss in broilers during exsanguination with 2 different neck cut methods. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 33(1). 100385–100385.

Buhr, R.J., et al.. (2023). Impact of exsanguination method on blood loss in broilers. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 32(4). 100380–100380. 2 indexed citations

Bourassa, D.V., et al.. (2019). Evaluation of Drinking Water Antimicrobial Interventions on Water Usage, Feed Consumption, and Salmonella Retention in Broilers Following Feed and Water Withdrawal. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 28(3). 699–711. 5 indexed citations

Geller, Daniel P., et al.. (2018). Biomass productivity of snow algae and model production algae under low temperature and low light conditions. Algal Research. 33. 133–141. 10 indexed citations

Wang, Shunli, Gary L. Hawkins, B.H. Kiepper, & Keshav C. Das. (2018). Treatment of slaughterhouse blood waste using pilot scale two-stage anaerobic digesters for biogas production. Renewable Energy. 126. 552–562. 45 indexed citations

Rothrock, Michael J., Aude Locatelli, Travis C. Glenn, et al.. (2016). Assessing the microbiomes of scalder and chiller tank waters throughout a typical commercial poultry processing day. Poultry Science. 95(10). 2372–2382. 28 indexed citations

Wang, Shunli, Gary L. Hawkins, B.H. Kiepper, & Keshav C. Das. (2016). Struvite Precipitation as a Means of Recovering Nutrients and Mitigating Ammonia Toxicity in a Two-Stage Anaerobic Digester Treating Protein-Rich Feedstocks. Molecules. 21(8). 1011–1011. 16 indexed citations

Dunkley, Claudia, Brian D. Fairchild, Casey W. Ritz, B.H. Kiepper, & Paige Lacy. (2015). Carbon footprint of poultry production farms in South Georgia: A case study. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 24(1). 73–79. 9 indexed citations

10.

Collins, Katie, et al.. (2014). Growth, livability, feed consumption, and carcass composition of the Athens Canadian Random Bred 1955 meat-type chicken versus the 2012 high-yielding Cobb 500 broiler. Poultry Science. 93(12). 2953–2962. 40 indexed citations

11.

Buhr, R.J., et al.. (2014). Impact of broiler processing scalding and chilling profiles on carcass and breast meat yield. Poultry Science. 93(6). 1534–1541. 19 indexed citations

12.

Zhuang, Hong, Brian Bowker, R. Jeff Buhr, D.V. Bourassa, & B.H. Kiepper. (2013). Effects of broiler carcass scalding and chilling methods on quality of early-deboned breast fillets. Poultry Science. 92(5). 1393–1399. 14 indexed citations

13.

Kiepper, B.H., et al.. (2013). White striping in processed broiler muscle tissue: A growing problem?. 1 indexed citations

14.

Kiepper, B.H., et al.. (2012). Membrane Filtration of Poultry Processing Wastewater: I. Pre-DAF (Dissolved Air Flotation). Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 28(2). 231–236. 7 indexed citations

15.

Kiepper, B.H., et al.. (2011). Impact of Poultry Processing By-Products on Wastewater Generation, Treatment, and Discharges. SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology). 12 indexed citations

16.

Kiepper, B.H.. (2009). Understanding your water bill. 2 indexed citations

17.

Kiepper, B.H.. (2009). Effects of tertiary microsieving on the composition of poultry processing wastewater. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 18(4). 716–724. 4 indexed citations

18.

Kiepper, B.H.. (2009). Processing tip: Back to basics: Revisiting blood collection. 1 indexed citations

19.

Kiepper, B.H., William C. Merka, & D.L. FLETCHER. (2008). Proximate Composition of Poultry Processing Wastewater Particulate Matter from Broiler Slaughter Plants. Poultry Science. 87(8). 1633–1636. 25 indexed citations

20.

Kiepper, B.H.. (2001). A SURVEY OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT PRACTICES IN THE BROILER INDUSTRY. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation. 2001(12). 12–25. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact