Beverley Clack
- Gender Studies top 10%
-
- Theological Perspectives and Practices 5
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 3
- Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies 3
- Social and Cultural Dynamics 2
- Racial and Ethnic Identity Research 2
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Religious studies top 5%
- Urban Studies top 10%
-
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 5
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 3
- Karl Barth and Christian Theology 2
- Co-authors
- Colin TredouxJohn DixonKevin DurrheimLiberty EatonLinda R. TroppMichael QuayleGillian FinchilescuPamela Sue Anderson
- Journals
- Feminist Theology (3 papers)Literature and Theology (2 papers)International Journal of Philosophy and Theology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Beverley Clack
23 papers receiving 406 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Gender Studies 77
- Sociology and Political Science 340
- Social Psychology 139
- Religious studies 24
- Urban Studies 16
Countries citing papers authored by Beverley Clack
This map shows the geographic impact of Beverley Clack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beverley Clack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beverley Clack more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Beverley Clack
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beverley Clack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beverley Clack. The network helps show where Beverley Clack may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Beverley Clack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 56 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 34 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 40 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 28 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 70 | |
| 15 | Feminist Philosophy of Religion: Critical Readings | 2004 | 6 |
| 16 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 19 | Misogyny in the Western Philosophical Tradition: A Reader | 1999 | 2 |
| 20 | 1995 | 0 |
About Beverley Clack
Beverley Clack is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 28 papers that have together received 442 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (5 papers), Theological Perspectives and Practices (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (3 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (3 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (2 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (2 papers) and Karl Barth and Christian Theology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (77 citations), Sociology and Political Science (340 citations), Social Psychology (139 citations), Religious studies (24 citations) and Urban Studies (16 citations). Beverley Clack has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Colin Tredoux, John Dixon, Kevin Durrheim, Liberty Eaton, Linda R. Tropp, Michael Quayle, Gillian Finchilescu and Pamela Sue Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as Feminist Theology, Literature and Theology, International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, Research Papers in Education and Women s Studies International Forum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.