Bettina Zippel‐Schultz

27 papers receiving 193 citations

Peers

Bettina Zippel‐Schultz
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 74
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 39
  • General Health Professions 37
  • Epidemiology 32
  • Strategy and Management 18
Replace Tauben Averbuch with:
Tauben Averbuch Canada
Kurt J. G. Schmailzl Germany
Shaheer Ellahi Khan Pakistan
Ross J. Lordon United States
Michael Huen Sum Lam Hong Kong
Fiona Bradley United Kingdom
Kelly Hynes United States
Natasha Alvarado United Kingdom
Leonardo Bonisson Ribeiro Brazil
Lise Kvistgaard Jensen Denmark
Bettina Zippel‐Schultz relative to Tauben Averbuch Canada Tauben Averbuch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Tauben Averbuch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bettina Zippel‐Schultz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bettina Zippel‐Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bettina Zippel‐Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bettina Zippel‐Schultz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bettina Zippel‐Schultz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bettina Zippel‐Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bettina Zippel‐Schultz. The network helps show where Bettina Zippel‐Schultz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bettina Zippel‐Schultz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bettina Zippel‐Schultz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bettina Zippel‐Schultz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bettina Zippel‐Schultz. Bettina Zippel‐Schultz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 1
4 0
5 1
6 1
7
Künstliche Intelligenz in der Kardiologie: Relevanz, aktuelle Anwendungen und nächste Schritte
1
8 5
9 0
10 17
11 5
12 3
13 11
14 15
15 1
16
Aktueller Stand und Zukunft des Telemonitoring: Szenarien für die telemedizinische Versorgung im Jahr 2025
1
17 6
18 17
19 18
20 31

About Bettina Zippel‐Schultz

Bettina Zippel‐Schultz is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Family Practice and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 33 papers that have together received 209 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (8 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (7 papers) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (13 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (74 citations) and Family Practice (6 citations). Bettina Zippel‐Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Carsten Schultz, Thomas M. Helms, Søren Salomo, Hans‐Peter Brunner‐La Rocca, Martin Stockburger, Christoph A. Karle, Karl‐Heinz Kück, Tiny Jaarsma, José María Verdú-Rotellar and Judita Kinkorová. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Journal of Medical Systems and Substance Use & Misuse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026