Thomas M. Helms

45 papers receiving 706 citations

Peers

Thomas M. Helms
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Neurology 148
  • Family Practice 26
  • Health Informatics 14
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 217
  • Epidemiology 169
Replace Ya-Ping Jin with:
Ya-Ping Jin Canada
Leslie M. Niziol United States
René Handschu Germany
Vikas Bhatia India
Pratik Bhattacharya United States
Jakub S. Gąsior Poland
Gonçalo S. Duarte Portugal
Hend Mansoor United States
Robin Hofmann Sweden
David A. Quillen United States
Thomas M. Helms relative to Ya-Ping Jin Canada Ya-Ping Jin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ya-Ping Jin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Helms

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Helms's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Helms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Helms more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Helms

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Helms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Helms. The network helps show where Thomas M. Helms may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas M. Helms, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas M. Helms Line = papers co-authored together Thomas M. Helms links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20241
3
Künstliche Intelligenz in der Kardiologie: Relevanz, aktuelle Anwendungen und nächste Schritte
20211
4 20215
5 20210
6 202117
7 20215
8 20201
9 201911
10
Aktueller Stand und Zukunft des Telemonitoring: Szenarien für die telemedizinische Versorgung im Jahr 2025
20171
11 20170
12 20176
13 20177
14 20163
15 201533
16 20152
17 201418
18 2007195
19 200710
20
SOCIAL PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH TUBERCULOSIS.
19642

About Thomas M. Helms

Thomas M. Helms is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Family Practice, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Internal Medicine, having authored 53 papers that have together received 739 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (18 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (13 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (8 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (6 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (6 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (148 citations), Family Practice (26 citations), Health Informatics (14 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (217 citations) and Epidemiology (169 citations). Thomas M. Helms has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Carsten Schultz, Karl Georg Hæusler, W. U. Schmidt, Christian Meisel, Arno Villringer, Hans‐Dieter Volk, Ulrich Dirnagl, Bettina Zippel‐Schultz, Brigitte Wegner and Christian H. Nolte. Their work appears in journals such as The EPMA Journal, Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie, International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications, BMJ Open and Telemedicine Journal and e-Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026