Beth Gharrity Gardner is a scholar working on Communication, Language and Linguistics and Philosophy.
According to data from OpenAlex, Beth Gharrity Gardner has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 327 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Communication, 1 paper in Language and Linguistics and 1 paper in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Beth Gharrity Gardner's work include Media Studies and Communication (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (1 paper) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper). Beth Gharrity Gardner is often cited by papers focused on Media Studies and Communication (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (1 paper) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper). Beth Gharrity Gardner collaborates with scholars based in Denmark and United States. Beth Gharrity Gardner's co-authors include Francesca Polletta, Nicole Doerr, Stephen Davies, Magnus Wennerhag, Paul Almeida, Katrin Uba, Joost de Moor, Mattias Wahlström and Michiel De Vydt and has published in prestigious journals such as Annual Review of Sociology and Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen).
In The Last Decade
Beth Gharrity Gardner
3 papers
receiving
302 citations
Hit Papers
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Sociology of Storytelling
2011320 citationsFrancesca Polletta, Beth Gharrity Gardner et al.Annual Review of Sociologyprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Beth Gharrity Gardner Beth Gharrity Gardner (= 1×)
peers
Janet M. Ruane
Countries citing papers authored by Beth Gharrity Gardner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Gharrity Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Gharrity Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Gharrity Gardner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Gharrity Gardner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Gharrity Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Gharrity Gardner. The network helps show where Beth Gharrity Gardner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beth Gharrity Gardner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beth Gharrity Gardner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beth Gharrity Gardner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Beth Gharrity Gardner. Beth Gharrity Gardner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
3 of 3 papers shown
1.
Doerr, Nicole & Beth Gharrity Gardner. (2022). After the storm. Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen). 1(1). 83–104.4 indexed citations
2.
Moor, Joost de, Katrin Uba, Mattias Wahlström, et al.. (2020). Introduction: Fridays For Future - an expanding climate movement.3 indexed citations
3.
Polletta, Francesca, et al.. (2011). The Sociology of Storytelling. Annual Review of Sociology. 37(1). 109–130.320 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.