Beth Fordham
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research 2
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 6
-
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies 3
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 5
-
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 3
- Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation 3
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 2
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 2
Beth Fordham
22 papers receiving 620 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Psychiatry and Mental health 158
- Pharmacology 149
- Complementary and alternative medicine 60
- Applied Psychology 35
- Clinical Psychology 123
Countries citing papers authored by Beth Fordham
This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Fordham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Fordham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Fordham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Fordham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Fordham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Fordham. The network helps show where Beth Fordham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth Fordham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 32 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 80 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 128 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 47 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 80 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 4 |
About Beth Fordham
Beth Fordham is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (3 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (2 papers) and Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (158 citations), Pharmacology (149 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (60 citations), Applied Psychology (35 citations) and Clinical Psychology (123 citations). Beth Fordham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Sarah E Lamb, Christine Bundy, C.E.M. Griffiths, Bethan Copsey, Zafra Cooper, Zara Hansen, Esther Williamson, Helen Richmond, Amanda Häll and Ranjit Lall. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Health Technology Assessment, Patient Preference and Adherence, International Journal of Eating Disorders and Spine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.