Bernhard Schlink

742 citations
23 papers · 159 indexed · h-index 5

Bernhard Schlink

17 papers receiving 130 citations

Peers

Bernhard Schlink
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Law 78
  • Political Science and International Relations 115
  • Philosophy 17
  • Sociology and Political Science 65
  • History 7
Replace Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde with:
Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde
W. J. Waluchow Canada
Lars Vinx United Kingdom
Zoran Oklopčić Canada
Joel I. Colón‐Ríos New Zealand
Grégoire Webber United Kingdom
Iddo Porat Israel
Oliver Lepsius Germany
Michel Troper France
Jörg Kammerhofer Germany
Bernhard Schlink relative to Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bernhard Schlink

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bernhard Schlink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernhard Schlink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernhard Schlink more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bernhard Schlink

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernhard Schlink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernhard Schlink. The network helps show where Bernhard Schlink may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Bernhard Schlink, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bernhard Schlink Line = papers co-authored together Bernhard Schlink links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20220
2 20201
3 20182
4
Proportionality in Constitutional Law: Why Everywhere But Here?
201228
5
Die Kultur des Denunziatorischen
20111
6 20101
7 20071
8 20073
9
Vergewisserungen : über Politik, Recht, Schreiben und Glauben
20051
10 20041
11 200310
12 20033
13
Vergangenheitsschuld und gegenwärtiges Recht
20022
14
Weimar: A Jurisprudence of Crisis
200176
15
Heimat als Utopie
20005
16
Bernhard Schlink : Der Vorleser
20001
17 19964
18
GRUNDRECHTE ALS PRINZIPIEN
19924
19 19821
20 197612

About Bernhard Schlink

Bernhard Schlink is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science and Biochemistry, having authored 23 papers that have together received 159 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law and Political Science (8 papers), Digitalization, Law, and Regulation (3 papers), Criminal Law and Policy (3 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (3 papers), European history and politics (2 papers), Medical and Health Sciences Research (2 papers), German Security and Defense Policies (1 paper) and Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (78 citations), Political Science and International Relations (115 citations), Philosophy (17 citations), Sociology and Political Science (65 citations) and History (7 citations). Bernhard Schlink has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Arthur J. Jacobson, Ralf Poscher and Michael Fröhlich. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Constitutional Law, Constellations, German Studies Review, Merkur and University of Toronto Law Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026