Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Neurology top 5%
- Rheumatology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Pablo VillosladaElena H. Martínez‐LapiscinaAlbert SaizSara LlufriúElena Fraga‐PumarSantiago Ortiz-PérezIñigo GabilondoEloy Martínez‐Heras
- Topics
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (23 papers)Retinal and Optic Conditions (19 papers)Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (11 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONENeurologyAnnals of Neurology
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesColombia
In The Last Decade
Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau
66 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 606
- Ophthalmology 603
- Neurology 258
- Rheumatology 218
- Molecular Biology 198
Countries citing papers authored by Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau
This map shows the geographic impact of Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau. The network helps show where Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau. Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 132 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | Is optic neuritis incidence rising? Evidences from an epidemiological study in Barcelona, Spain 2008-2012 | 1 |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 123 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | Síndromes paraneoplásicos en oftalmología | 2 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau
Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (23 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (19 papers) and Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (603 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (606 citations) and Neurology (258 citations). Bernardo Sánchez‐Dalmau has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Pablo Villoslada, Elena H. Martínez‐Lapiscina, Albert Saiz, Sara Llufriú, Elena Fraga‐Pumar, Santiago Ortiz-Pérez, Iñigo Gabilondo, Eloy Martínez‐Heras, María Sepúlveda and Rubén Torres–Torres. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Neurology and Annals of Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.