Bernard Lapointe

585 total citations
10 papers, 430 citations indexed

About

Bernard Lapointe is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Bernard Lapointe has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 430 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 4 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Bernard Lapointe's work include Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers). Bernard Lapointe is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers). Bernard Lapointe collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Japan. Bernard Lapointe's co-authors include Neil A. Hagen, Patrick du Souich, S. Robin Cohen, Balfour M. Mount, Anh Ho Ngoc, May Ong-Lam, David Walde, Kim Fisher, Srini Chary and Dwight E. Moulin and has published in prestigious journals such as AIDS, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and Pain Research and Management.

In The Last Decade

Bernard Lapointe

9 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

Bernard Lapointe

MB

PHYSI

APM

EC

PHEOH

Reiko Kishi Japan

Meredith L. Howard United States

Judy L. Endres United States

F. van der Veen Netherlands

Kristen Brown United States

Diane Portman United States

Anna Cargill United Kingdom

Frances Cartwright United States

Shannon N. Saldaña United States

Czesław Żaba Poland

Reiko Kishi Japan

Bernard Lapointe

78 ×0.6

MB

27 ×0.2

PHYSI

13 ×0.1

APM

34 ×0.4

EC

86 ×1.0

PHEOH

Citations per year, relative to Bernard Lapointe Bernard Lapointe (= 1×) peers Reiko Kishi

Countries citing papers authored by Bernard Lapointe

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bernard Lapointe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bernard Lapointe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bernard Lapointe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bernard Lapointe

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bernard Lapointe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bernard Lapointe. The network helps show where Bernard Lapointe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bernard Lapointe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bernard Lapointe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bernard Lapointe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bernard Lapointe. Bernard Lapointe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Lapointe, Bernard. (2021). Cris et chuchotements. Frontières. 12(2). 58–63.

2.

McPherson, Mary Lynn, Mellar P. Davis, Éduardo Bruera, et al.. (2018). Safe and Appropriate Use of Methadone in Hospice and Palliative Care: Expert Consensus White Paper. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 57(3). 635–645.e4. 46 indexed citations

3.

Hagen, Neil A., John Constant, Gilbert Blaise, et al.. (2017). Tetrodotoxin for Moderate to Severe Cancer-Related Pain: A Multicentre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Design Trial. Pain Research and Management. 2017. 1–7. 54 indexed citations

4.

Daeninck, Paul, Bruno Gagnon, Romayne Gallagher, et al.. (2016). Canadian Recommendations for the Management of Breakthrough Cancer Pain. Current Oncology. 23(2). 96–108. 24 indexed citations

5.

Cohen, S. Robin, Dawn Allen, Vasiliki Bitzas, et al.. (2015). OA8 Caring for the family caregiver: working with volunteers to implement and improve a service to enable family caregivers to maintain their own wellbeing. PubMed. 5 Suppl 1. A3.1–A3. 2 indexed citations

6.

Hagen, Neil A., Bernard Lapointe, May Ong-Lam, et al.. (2011). A Multicentre Open-Label Safety and Efficacy Study of Tetrodotoxin for Cancer Pain. Current Oncology. 18(3). 109–116. 54 indexed citations

7.

Bitzas, Vasiliki, et al.. (2011). Encouraging Patients and Families to Influence Change on a Palliative Care Unit. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 26(4). 350–357. 4 indexed citations

8.

Hagen, Neil A., Patrick du Souich, Bernard Lapointe, et al.. (2008). Tetrodotoxin for Moderate to Severe Cancer Pain: A Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Design Multicenter Study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 35(4). 420–429. 73 indexed citations

9.

Hagen, Neil A., Kim Fisher, Bernard Lapointe, et al.. (2007). An Open-Label, Multi-Dose Efficacy and Safety Study of Intramuscular Tetrodotoxin in Patients with Severe Cancer-Related Pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 34(2). 171–182. 67 indexed citations

10.

Cohen, S. Robin, et al.. (1996). Quality of life in HIV disease as measured by the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire. AIDS. 10(12). 1421–1427. 106 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact