Bent Rosenbaum

1.2k citations
60 papers · 824 indexed · h-index 15

Bent Rosenbaum

55 papers receiving 748 citations

Peers

Bent Rosenbaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 434
  • Philosophy 280
  • Clinical Psychology 487
  • Biological Psychiatry 29
  • Social Psychology 176
Replace Mark Savill with:
Mark Savill United States
Niall Crumlish Ireland
Lois W. Choi‐Kain United States
Steven Adelsheim United States
Eóin Killackey Australia
Benjamin Hummelen Norway
Mickey Kongerslev Denmark
Peter Fiedler Germany
Emily C. Gagen United States
Linda Everard United Kingdom
Bent Rosenbaum relative to Mark Savill United States Mark Savill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Mark Savill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bent Rosenbaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bent Rosenbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bent Rosenbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bent Rosenbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bent Rosenbaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bent Rosenbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bent Rosenbaum. The network helps show where Bent Rosenbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bent Rosenbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bent Rosenbaum Line = papers co-authored together Bent Rosenbaum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 20230
3
Rewritalize:Kreative skrivegrupper som del af den psykiatriske behandling
20212
4 20211
5 20209
6 20194
7 201646
8 20147
9 20137
10
Traumatische Träume: Streben nach Beziehung
20125
11 20123
12 201256
13 20115
14
Behandling af suicidalpatienter: Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality
20082
15 200887
16 200721
17 200580
18 20051
19 20046
20 199713

About Bent Rosenbaum

Bent Rosenbaum is a scholar working on Philosophy, Clinical Psychology, Conservation, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 824 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (22 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (22 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (15 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (12 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (6 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (5 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (5 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (434 citations), Philosophy (280 citations), Clinical Psychology (487 citations), Biological Psychiatry (29 citations) and Social Psychology (176 citations). Bent Rosenbaum has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Sverre Varvin, Anne Lindhardt, Anne Køster, Susanne Harder, Kristian Valbak, Nicole Rosenberg, Merete Nordentoft, Sidse Arnfred, Esben Hougaard and Nina Reinholt. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Psychiatry, Quality of Life Research, Psychotherapy Research and The International Journal of Psychoanalysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026