Benoit St‐Pierre
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology 17
- Berberine and alkaloids research 9
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 5
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology 17
- Berberine and alkaloids research 9
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 5
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 26
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration 21
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 11
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis 8
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 6
Benoit St‐Pierre
68 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Pharmacology 670
- Pharmacology 760
- Molecular Biology 2.6k
- Biotechnology 282
- Plant Science 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Benoit St‐Pierre
This map shows the geographic impact of Benoit St‐Pierre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoit St‐Pierre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoit St‐Pierre more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Benoit St‐Pierre
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoit St‐Pierre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoit St‐Pierre. The network helps show where Benoit St‐Pierre may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoit St‐Pierre, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 80 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 50 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 115 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 18 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 85 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 70 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 124 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 229 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 91 | |
| 20 | 1994 | 79 |
About Benoit St‐Pierre
Benoit St‐Pierre is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Biochemistry, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (26 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (21 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (17 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (11 papers), Berberine and alkaloids research (9 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (8 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (6 papers) and Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (670 citations), Pharmacology (760 citations), Molecular Biology (2.6k citations), Biotechnology (282 citations) and Plant Science (1.2k citations). Benoit St‐Pierre has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Vincenzo De Luca, Vincent Burlat, Vincent Courdavault, Felipe Vázquez‐Flota, Audrey Oudin, Nathalie Giglioli‐Guivarc’h, Samira Mahroug, Pierre Laflamme, Arnaud Lanoue and Peter J. Facchini. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Plant Molecular Biology, The Plant Journal, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY and Planta.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.