Benoît Larose

870 citations
43 papers · 422 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Benoît Larose

39 papers receiving 381 citations

Peers

Benoît Larose
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 136
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 335
  • Geometry and Topology 92
  • Algebra and Number Theory 34
  • Computer Networks and Communications 145
Replace Michael Pinsker with:
Michael Pinsker Austria
Marcin Kozik Poland
Norbert Seifter Austria
Charles Vanden Eynden United States
Stephen C. Locke United States
Ajai Kapoor Italy
Balázs Patkós Hungary
Po‐Shen Loh United States
Norbert Sauer Canada
L. Pyber Hungary
Benoît Larose relative to Michael Pinsker Austria Michael Pinsker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Michael Pinsker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît Larose

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît Larose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît Larose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît Larose more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît Larose

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît Larose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît Larose. The network helps show where Benoît Larose may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Benoît Larose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît Larose Line = papers co-authored together Benoît Larose links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200370
2 200754
3 200730
4 200624
5 200623
6 200720
7 199718
8 200215
9 200315
10 200815
11 199814
12 200912
13 201111
14 200410
15 201710
16 20009
17 19918
18 20087
19 20057
20 20047

About Benoît Larose

Benoît Larose is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Computer Networks and Communications, Algebra and Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Graph Theory Research (29 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (14 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (12 papers), semigroups and automata theory (10 papers), Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (9 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (8 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (6 papers) and Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (136 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (335 citations), Geometry and Topology (92 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (34 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (145 citations). Benoît Larose has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Claude Tardif, Claudia Malvenuto, Andrei Krokhin, Pascal Tesson, Víctor Dalmau, Hubie Chen, François Laviolette, Matthew Valeriote, Adrien Lemaître and Arash Rafiey. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, European Journal of Combinatorics, Discrete Mathematics, International Journal of Algebra and Computation and Journal of Graph Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact