Benoît De Boeck

1.1k citations
21 papers · 852 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Benoît De Boeck

19 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers

Benoît De Boeck
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Pharmacology 184
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 201
  • Organic Chemistry 270
  • Spectroscopy 91
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 39
Replace Guanyu Wang with:
Guanyu Wang China
Thomas Gaillard France
Neal Langerman United States
Paul Jackson United Kingdom
Shaoxia Yu United States
M. I. S. Sastry India
Jingbao Liu China
Aleksei Kabedev Sweden
Subhash Ajmani India
Muhamad Mustafa Egypt
Benoît De Boeck relative to Guanyu Wang China Guanyu Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×13.1×
Guanyu Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benoît De Boeck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benoît De Boeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benoît De Boeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benoît De Boeck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benoît De Boeck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benoît De Boeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benoît De Boeck. The network helps show where Benoît De Boeck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benoît De Boeck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benoît De Boeck Line = papers co-authored together Benoît De Boeck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005411
2 2003106
3 199449
4 201138
5 200434
6 199526
7 202426
8 199823
9 199321
10 201720
11 200418
12 200415
13 199813
14 200112
15 199811
16 19927
17 20237
18 20237
19
State of the art on hydrogen passive auto-catalytic recombiner (european union Parsoar project)
20015
20 19902

About Benoît De Boeck

Benoît De Boeck is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Pharmacology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 852 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radical Photochemical Reactions (4 papers), Malaria Research and Control (3 papers), Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (3 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (3 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Pyrroles (3 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (3 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (2 papers) and Rocket and propulsion systems research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (184 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (201 citations), Organic Chemistry (270 citations), Spectroscopy (91 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (39 citations). Benoît De Boeck has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Trevor J. Howe, Emanuele Carosati, Riccardo Vianello, Gabriele Cruciani, Kantharaj Ethirajulu, Claire E. Mackie, Gerald Pattenden, Heinz G�nter Viehe, Zdeněk Janoušek and Jan F. Van Bocxlaer. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Engineering and Design, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Tetrahedron, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry and Tetrahedron Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact