Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Bennett Harrison
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Bennett Harrison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bennett Harrison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bennett Harrison more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bennett Harrison
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bennett Harrison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bennett Harrison. The network helps show where Bennett Harrison may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bennett Harrison
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bennett Harrison.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bennett Harrison based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bennett Harrison. Bennett Harrison is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Howell, David R., et al.. (1998). Low Wages in the US and High Unemployment in Europe: A Critical Assessment of the Conventional Wisdom. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.5 indexed citations
Bluestone, Barry & Bennett Harrison. (1988). The Growth of Low-Wage Employment: 1963-86. American Economic Review. 78(2). 124–128.64 indexed citations
10.
Harrison, Bennett, et al.. (1988). The Great U-Turn.157 indexed citations
11.
Cavin, Edward, Barry Bluestone, & Bennett Harrison. (1985). The Deindustrialization of America: Plant Closings, Community Abandonment, and the Dismantling of Basic Industry. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 4(2). 291–291.434 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Bluestone, Barry & Bennett Harrison. (1983). The deindustrialization of America. Business Horizons. 26(6). 80–81.645 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Harrison, Bennett. (1982). Rationalization, restructuring, and industrial reorganization in older regions : the economic transformation of New England since World War II. Medical Entomology and Zoology.8 indexed citations
Harrison, Bennett. (1974). Ghetto Economic Development: A Survey. Journal of Economic Literature. 12(1). 1–37.27 indexed citations
16.
Vietorisz, Thomas & Bennett Harrison. (1973). Labor Market Segmentation: Positive Feedback and Divergent Development. American Economic Review. 63(2). 366–376.87 indexed citations
17.
Harrison, Bennett. (1973). Public Employment and Urban Poverty..5 indexed citations
18.
Harrison, Bennett. (1972). Education and Underemployment in the Urban Ghetto. American Economic Review. 62(5). 796–812.26 indexed citations
19.
Peet, Richard, Thomas Vietorisz, & Bennett Harrison. (1972). The Economic Development of Harlem. Geographical Review. 62(1). 143–143.24 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.