Benjamin Swift

1.3k citations
22 papers · 807 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

    • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
    • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Archeology top 5%
    • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Papers in

Benjamin Swift

22 papers receiving 770 citations

Peers

Benjamin Swift
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Infectious Diseases 255
  • Archeology 83
  • Hepatology 54
  • Neurology 102
  • General Dentistry 12
Replace Nicolas Zhou with:
Nicolas Zhou United States
Ian Forrest United Kingdom
Jacobo Pardo‐Seco Spain
Guimei Li China
Gino Fornaciari Italy
William J. Stone United States
Amy Sullivan United States
Amaro Nunes Duarte‐Neto Brazil
Benedikt Becker Germany
Batia Sarov Israel
Benjamin Swift relative to Nicolas Zhou United States Nicolas Zhou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17×
Nicolas Zhou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Swift

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Swift's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Swift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Swift more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Swift

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Swift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Swift. The network helps show where Benjamin Swift may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Swift, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Swift Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Swift links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2020327
2 200440
3 200316
4 20032
5 200312
6 200315
7 200255
8 20028
9 20026
10 200281
11 200139
12 19993
13 199852
14 198339
15 19797
16 197844
17
A bovine herpesvirus isolated from sheep.
19787
18
Iatrogenic transmission of Anaplasma marginale in beef cattle.
197718
19 19733
20 197110

About Benjamin Swift

Benjamin Swift is a scholar working on Microbiology, Parasitology, Archeology, Hepatology and Insect Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 807 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Paleopathology and ancient diseases (4 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (4 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (4 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (3 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (3 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers) and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (255 citations), Archeology (83 citations), Hepatology (54 citations), Neurology (102 citations) and General Dentistry (12 citations). Benjamin Swift has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Sebastian Lucas, Michael Osborn, Brian Hanley, Esther Youd, Guy N. Rutty, N. J. Cronin, David Lloyd, K. West, B. A. Brown and Myron J. Mitchell. Their work appears in journals such as The International Journal of Biological Markers, Forensic Science International, Journal of Clinical Pathology, American Journal of Forensic Medicine & Pathology and Journal of Environmental Quality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026