Benjamin Loveday

2.9k total citations
80 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Benjamin Loveday is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Benjamin Loveday has authored 80 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Surgery, 40 papers in Oncology and 20 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Benjamin Loveday's work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (36 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (24 papers) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (11 papers). Benjamin Loveday is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (36 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (24 papers) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (11 papers). Benjamin Loveday collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United Kingdom. Benjamin Loveday's co-authors include John A. Windsor, Anubhav Mittal, Sanjay Pandanaboyana, Anthony R.J. Phillips, Anthony R. J. Phillips, Benjamin Thomson, Maxim S. Petrov, John Ford, Mattias Soop and M. Rodgers and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Free Radical Biology and Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Benjamin Loveday

70 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benjamin Loveday New Zealand 23 941 614 548 215 203 80 1.7k
Richard Cohen United Kingdom 22 1.0k 1.1× 436 0.7× 638 1.2× 159 0.7× 340 1.7× 46 2.1k
Merril T. Dayton United States 25 1.6k 1.7× 528 0.9× 488 0.9× 132 0.6× 274 1.3× 61 2.5k
Hui Ye China 10 724 0.8× 432 0.7× 448 0.8× 269 1.3× 65 0.3× 42 1.7k
Hairong Xu China 26 225 0.2× 766 1.2× 702 1.3× 336 1.6× 99 0.5× 111 2.6k
Irenäus A. Adamietz Germany 27 915 1.0× 510 0.8× 593 1.1× 195 0.9× 41 0.2× 120 2.1k
Lars Lund Denmark 22 577 0.6× 225 0.4× 591 1.1× 298 1.4× 55 0.3× 180 1.8k
Liang‐Hao Hu China 23 1.1k 1.2× 828 1.3× 411 0.8× 203 0.9× 60 0.3× 146 1.7k
Harald Schrem Germany 23 1.4k 1.5× 540 0.9× 327 0.6× 300 1.4× 75 0.4× 135 2.4k
Wei-Shu Wang Taiwan 23 334 0.4× 662 1.1× 243 0.4× 405 1.9× 52 0.3× 54 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Loveday

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Loveday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Loveday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Loveday more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Loveday

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Loveday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Loveday. The network helps show where Benjamin Loveday may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benjamin Loveday

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benjamin Loveday. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benjamin Loveday based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benjamin Loveday. Benjamin Loveday is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pandanaboyana, Sanjay, et al.. (2025). Relationship between pancreatic cancer resection rate and survival at population level: systematic review. BJS Open. 9(2). 1 indexed citations
3.
Brown, Lisa, et al.. (2024). Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: Overview of management. Australian Journal of General Practice. 53(11). 835–839.
4.
Kashyap, Raghava, et al.. (2024). Role of neoadjuvant peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in unresectable and metastatic gastro‐entero‐pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A scoping review. Journal of Neuroendocrinology. 37(3). e13425–e13425. 1 indexed citations
5.
Loveday, Benjamin, et al.. (2023). Paradigms in trauma laparoscopy for anterior abdominal stab wounds: A scoping review. Injury. 55(2). 111298–111298.
6.
Wearn, Andy, et al.. (2023). Relationship between medical programme progress test performance and surgical clinical attachment timing and performance. Medical Teacher. 45(8). 877–884. 2 indexed citations
7.
Loveday, Benjamin, et al.. (2022). Locally invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the pancreas requiring multivisceral resection. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 92(12). 3366–3368. 1 indexed citations
8.
Rowcroft, Alistair, et al.. (2021). A systematic scoping review of the initial experience with laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic malignancy. Surgical Endoscopy. 35(9). 4930–4944. 11 indexed citations
9.
Cocco, Annelise, et al.. (2021). Surgical Decision Making in Pancreatic and Duodenal Trauma. HPB. 23. S79–S80.
10.
Flood, Michael P., Joseph C. Kong, Robert G. Ramsay, et al.. (2021). Synchronous Liver Resection, Cytoreductive Surgery, and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Liver and Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 64(6). 754–764. 15 indexed citations
11.
Loveday, Benjamin, et al.. (2020). Use of social media for surgical education in Australia and New Zealand. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 90(6). 1004–1008. 4 indexed citations
12.
Ratnayake, Bathiya, Cameron I. Wells, John A. Windsor, et al.. (2020). Epidural Versus Transabdominal Wall Catheters: A Comparative Study of Outcomes After Pancreatic Resection. Journal of Surgical Research. 259. 473–479. 3 indexed citations
13.
Ratnayake, Bathiya, Sivesh K. Kamarajah, Benjamin Loveday, et al.. (2020). A Network Meta-analysis of Surgery for Chronic Pancreatitis: Impact on Pain and Quality of Life. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 24(12). 2865–2873. 7 indexed citations
14.
Loveday, Benjamin, et al.. (2020). Assessing the risk of viral infection from gases and plumes during intra‐abdominal surgery: a systematic scoping review. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 90(10). 1857–1862. 2 indexed citations
15.
Loveday, Benjamin, Lara Lipton, & Benjamin Thomson. (2019). Pancreatic cancer: An update on diagnosis and management. Australian Journal of General Practice. 48(12). 826–831. 58 indexed citations
16.
Pandanaboyana, Sanjay, et al.. (2017). Artery first approach to pancreatic cancer resection: A review of the evidence for benefit. JOP, journal of the pancreas. 18(5). 2 indexed citations
17.
O’Grady, Gregory, et al.. (2010). Working hours and roster structures of surgical trainees in Australia and New Zealand. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 80(12). 890–895. 18 indexed citations
18.
Loveday, Benjamin, Jeremy Rossaak, Anubhav Mittal, Anthony R. J. Phillips, & John A. Windsor. (2010). Survey of trends in minimally invasive intervention for necrotizing pancreatitis. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 81(1-2). 56–64. 11 indexed citations
19.
Loveday, Benjamin, et al.. (2010). A randomized trial evaluating a cognitive simulator for laparoscopic appendectomy. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 80(9). 588–594. 13 indexed citations
20.
Annis, David B., et al.. (1978). An elastomeric vascular prosthesis.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 24. 209–14. 99 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026