Benedict Williams

962 total citations
11 papers, 160 citations indexed

About

Benedict Williams is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Benedict Williams has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 160 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Benedict Williams's work include Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers). Benedict Williams is often cited by papers focused on Online and Blended Learning (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (2 papers). Benedict Williams collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Benedict Williams's co-authors include Jason Skues, Lisa Wise, Anna Thomas, Richard Moulding, Catherine Wood, Glen Bates, Susan J. Paxton, Jill Francis, Jennifer Boldero and Anne Hampton and has published in prestigious journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction and Asian Journal Of Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Benedict Williams

8 papers receiving 145 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Benedict Williams Australia 5 105 67 50 21 21 11 160
Anthony M. Bean United States 6 157 1.5× 55 0.8× 71 1.4× 14 0.7× 14 0.7× 11 185
Paul E. Weigle United States 6 183 1.7× 130 1.9× 51 1.0× 34 1.6× 12 0.6× 18 242
Christopher L. Groves United States 7 119 1.1× 79 1.2× 42 0.8× 79 3.8× 13 0.6× 14 195
Ivo Čermák Czechia 8 83 0.8× 97 1.4× 93 1.9× 80 3.8× 12 0.6× 32 227
Jeanne Funk Brockmyer United States 4 218 2.1× 160 2.4× 54 1.1× 62 3.0× 24 1.1× 4 287
Shuhong Lin China 7 201 1.9× 104 1.6× 99 2.0× 18 0.9× 51 2.4× 16 265
Reza Shabahang Iran 8 123 1.2× 35 0.5× 106 2.1× 45 2.1× 49 2.3× 51 243
Youssef Hasan Qatar 6 134 1.3× 61 0.9× 40 0.8× 95 4.5× 32 1.5× 11 214
Jano Ramos‐Diaz Peru 5 119 1.1× 58 0.9× 61 1.2× 13 0.6× 20 1.0× 12 151
Mansour Amini Malaysia 7 31 0.3× 38 0.6× 71 1.4× 37 1.8× 36 1.7× 64 262

Countries citing papers authored by Benedict Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benedict Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benedict Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benedict Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benedict Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benedict Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benedict Williams. The network helps show where Benedict Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Benedict Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Benedict Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Benedict Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Benedict Williams. Benedict Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Wise, Lisa, et al.. (2024). Game-like digital training tools: Transfer of cognitive and perceptual skills from static to dynamic interfaces. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 2012(1). 633.
2.
Wise, Lisa, et al.. (2024). Online training: sustainability in the face of unskilled, unsupervised, unmotivated 'long tail'. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 2012(1). 1061.
3.
Loch, Birgit, et al.. (2024). Enablers and barriers to academic’s acceptance of technology: Can “individual differences” make a difference?. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 607–611.
4.
Lund, Paul K., Timothy Colin Bednall, & Benedict Williams. (2022). The Effects of Hybrid Work Choices and Worker Needs on Employee Wellbeing. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2022(1). 1 indexed citations
5.
Williams, Benedict, et al.. (2018). A Stress-Coping Model of Problem Online Video Game Use. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 17(4). 845–858. 64 indexed citations
6.
Loch, Birgit, et al.. (2013). Enablers and Barriers to Academic's Acceptance of Technology. ASCILITE Publications. 607–611. 1 indexed citations
7.
Wise, Lisa, et al.. (2011). A perceptual training module for pilot instrument scans. ASCILITE Publications. 842–846. 2 indexed citations
8.
Wise, Lisa, Jason Skues, & Benedict Williams. (2011). Facebook in higher education promotes social but not academic engagement. ASCILITE Publications. 1332–1342. 60 indexed citations
9.
Wood, Catherine, et al.. (2011). Aggression Replacement Training (ART) in Australia: A Longitudinal Youth Justice Evaluation. Psychiatry Psychology and Law. 19(4). 577–604. 20 indexed citations
10.
Boldero, Jennifer, et al.. (2009). Relational discrepancies and emotion: The moderating roles of relationship type and relational discrepancy valence. Asian Journal Of Social Psychology. 12(4). 259–273. 5 indexed citations
11.
Paxton, Susan J., et al.. (2007). Predictors of Attitudes Towards Treatments for Bulimia Nervosa. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 41(3). 247–256. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026