Ben Williams

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 769 citations indexed

About

Ben Williams is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Molecular Biology and Nephrology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ben Williams has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 769 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in General Health Professions, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Nephrology. Recurrent topics in Ben Williams's work include Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers) and Renal function and acid-base balance (2 papers). Ben Williams is often cited by papers focused on Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers) and Renal function and acid-base balance (2 papers). Ben Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Ben Williams's co-authors include Karen Sugden, Terrie E. Moffitt, Avshalom Caspi, Andrea Danese, David L. Corcoran, Renate Houts, Richie Poulton, Daniel W. Belsky, Anatoli I. Yashin and HonaLee Harrington and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Critical Care Medicine and BMC Bioinformatics.

In The Last Decade

Ben Williams

8 papers receiving 740 citations

Hit Papers

Quantification of biological aging in young adults 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ben Williams United States 6 215 161 123 116 105 9 769
Troels Steenstrup Denmark 9 486 2.3× 121 0.8× 189 1.5× 141 1.2× 67 0.6× 12 904
Dellara F. Terry United States 18 322 1.5× 229 1.4× 385 3.1× 238 2.1× 50 0.5× 26 1.1k
Véronique Legault Canada 13 178 0.8× 99 0.6× 84 0.7× 26 0.2× 51 0.5× 24 625
Harold Bae United States 18 244 1.1× 211 1.3× 183 1.5× 236 2.0× 50 0.5× 45 1.3k
Jo Wrigglesworth Australia 11 135 0.6× 291 1.8× 28 0.2× 136 1.2× 82 0.8× 19 663
Pei-Lun Kuo United States 15 314 1.5× 69 0.4× 51 0.4× 27 0.2× 83 0.8× 20 846
Peter Fransquet Australia 16 190 0.9× 495 3.1× 30 0.2× 205 1.8× 79 0.8× 26 839
Albert Higgins‐Chen United States 10 133 0.6× 343 2.1× 55 0.4× 154 1.3× 75 0.7× 22 616
Adele Taylor United Kingdom 7 124 0.6× 345 2.1× 47 0.4× 187 1.6× 95 0.9× 10 672
Alessandro Gialluisi Italy 18 154 0.7× 220 1.4× 27 0.2× 50 0.4× 51 0.5× 63 950

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Williams. The network helps show where Ben Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ben Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ben Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ben Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ben Williams. Ben Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Dempster, Emma, Eilís Hannon, Jonathan Mill, et al.. (2023). A comparison of feature selection methodologies and learning algorithms in the development of a DNA methylation-based telomere length estimator. BMC Bioinformatics. 24(1). 178–178. 9 indexed citations
2.
Wilson, Graham, Sandhya Ramrakha, Antony Ambler, et al.. (2021). Are macular drusen in midlife a marker of accelerated biological ageing?. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 106(1). 41–46. 4 indexed citations
3.
Bourassa, Kyle J., Line Jee Hartmann Rasmussen, Andrea Danese, et al.. (2021). Linking stressful life events and chronic inflammation using suPAR (soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor). Brain Behavior and Immunity. 97. 79–88. 31 indexed citations
4.
Clark, Daniel E., et al.. (2021). A retrospective analysis of calcium levels in pediatric trauma patients.. PubMed. 11(3). 267–274. 5 indexed citations
5.
Reuben, Aaron, Karen Sugden, Louise Arseneault, et al.. (2020). Association of Neighborhood Disadvantage in Childhood With DNA Methylation in Young Adulthood. JAMA Network Open. 3(6). e206095–e206095. 49 indexed citations
6.
Belsky, Daniel W., Avshalom Caspi, Renate Houts, et al.. (2015). Quantification of biological aging in young adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112(30). E4104–10. 626 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Wilson, Christopher M., et al.. (2008). Bovine dermis: a novel biologic substitute for autologous tissue in sling surgery. International Urogynecology Journal. 19(12). 1671–1676. 1 indexed citations
8.
Williams, Ben, et al.. (1999). DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF PERIOPERATIVE METABOLIC ACIDOSIS. Critical Care Medicine. 27(Supplement). A42–A42. 1 indexed citations
9.
Williams, Ben, et al.. (1984). Stress Management at the Worksite for Hypertension: Compliance, Cost-Benefit, Health Care and Hypertension-Related Variables. Psychosomatic Medicine. 46(5). 387–397. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026