Ben W. Feather
Impact in
- General Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Papers in
-
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 3
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect 2
-
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 4
- Child Therapy and Development 2
- Co-authors
- Richard C. Chapman (2 shared papers)David T. Wells (5 shared papers)Lawrence F. Van Egeren (1 shared paper)C. Richard Chapman (2 shared papers)Robert H. Belmaker (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Psychophysiology (7 papers)Psychosomatic Medicine (2 papers)American Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (1 paper)Behaviour Research and Therapy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ben W. Feather
20 papers receiving 373 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- General Psychology 35
- Cognitive Neuroscience 170
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 107
- Clinical Psychology 128
- Behavioral Neuroscience 20
Countries citing papers authored by Ben W. Feather
This map shows the geographic impact of Ben W. Feather's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben W. Feather with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben W. Feather more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ben W. Feather
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben W. Feather. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben W. Feather. The network helps show where Ben W. Feather may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Ben W. Feather, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1973 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1965 | 64 | |
| 3 | 1971 | 54 | |
| 4 | 1971 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1972 | 38 | |
| 6 | 1972 | 31 | |
| 7 | 1972 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1972 | 19 | |
| 9 | 1968 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1974 | 16 | |
| 11 | 1972 | 15 | |
| 12 | 1971 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1966 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1973 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1967 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1965 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1968 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1972 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1967 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1961 | 1 |
About Ben W. Feather
Ben W. Feather is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Sensory Systems, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers), Child Therapy and Development (2 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (35 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (170 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (107 citations), Clinical Psychology (128 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (20 citations). Ben W. Feather has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard C. Chapman, David T. Wells, Lawrence F. Van Egeren, C. Richard Chapman and Robert H. Belmaker. Their work appears in journals such as Psychophysiology, Psychosomatic Medicine, American Journal of Psychiatry, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease and Behaviour Research and Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.