Ben Deen
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Face Recognition and Perception 9
- Neural dynamics and brain function 5
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 5
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 3
-
- Multisensory perception and integration 2
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion 2
- Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs 2
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments 3
- Co-authors
- Kevin A. PelphreyNaomi B. PitskelRebecca SaxeNancy KanwisherKami KoldewynLinda C. MayesMichael J. CrowleyDanielle Bolling
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (3 papers)Cerebral Cortex (2 papers)NeuroImage (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyFrance
In The Last Decade
Ben Deen
17 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 407
- Social Psychology 478
- Psychiatry and Mental health 333
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 162
Countries citing papers authored by Ben Deen
This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Deen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Deen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Deen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Deen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Deen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Deen. The network helps show where Ben Deen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ben Deen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 207 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 302 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 29 | |
| 11 | Neural correlates of social perception: The posterior superior temporal sulcus is modulated by action rationality, but not animacy | 2012 | 5 |
| 12 | 2012 | 55 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 63 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 92 | |
| 15 | Three Systems of Insular Functional Connectivity Identified with Cluster Analysisbreakdown → | 2010 | 580 |
| 16 | 2010 | 115 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 53 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 249 |
About Ben Deen
Ben Deen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (9 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (5 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (2 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (407 citations) and Social Psychology (478 citations). Ben Deen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Kevin A. Pelphrey, Naomi B. Pitskel, Rebecca Saxe, Nancy Kanwisher, Kami Koldewyn, Linda C. Mayes, Michael J. Crowley, Danielle Bolling, Gregory McCarthy and Daniel D. Dilks. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Cerebral Cortex, NeuroImage, Developmental Science and Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.