Ben Davies

16 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Ben Davies
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Management Science and Operations Research 98
  • Global and Planetary Change 82
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 53
  • Sociology and Political Science 51
Replace Jana-Axinja Paschen with:
Jana-Axinja Paschen Australia
Diana Córdoba Canada
Rachel F. Brummel United States
Nathan Rollins United States
Ute Brady United States
Jessica Cockburn South Africa
Graham Leicester United Kingdom
Yorck von Korff France
Nina Lilja United States
Janice Jiggins United Kingdom
Ben Davies relative to Jana-Axinja Paschen Australia Jana-Axinja Paschen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Jana-Axinja Paschen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Davies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Davies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Davies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Davies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Davies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Davies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Davies. The network helps show where Ben Davies may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ben Davies

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ben Davies. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ben Davies based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ben Davies. Ben Davies is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2
Learning to Discriminate: The Perfect Proxy Problem in Artificially Intelligent Criminal Sentencing
1
3
John Burnside: Contemporary Critical Perspectives
0
4 1
5
Prequel ontology and temporality: the thresholds of John Updike’s Gertrude and Claudius
1
6 3
7 1
8 53
9 5
10 122
11 55
12 4
13 48
14 2
15
A comparison of the shear bond strength of composite resin bonded by a fourth and a fifth generation dental adhesive to bovine teeth.
4
16
Electrosurgery in restorative Dentistry: 2. Clinical applications.
2
17
Electrosurgery in restorative dentistry: 1. Theory.
3

About Ben Davies

Ben Davies is a scholar working on Oral Surgery, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Music, having authored 17 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (3 papers) and Q Methodology Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (81 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (98 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (53 citations). Ben Davies has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ian Hodge, Kirsty Blackstock, Felix Rauschmayer, Chris Louca, Kirby Brown, Mohamed Mokhtari, Peter Shannon and Thomas Douglas. Their work appears in journals such as Ecological Economics, Journal of Agricultural Economics and Textual Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026