Ben Colburn

537 citations
20 papers · 151 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Ben Colburn

18 papers receiving 133 citations

Peers

Ben Colburn
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Philosophy 28
  • Political Science and International Relations 57
  • General Health Professions 31
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 25
  • Sociology and Political Science 48
Replace Danny Scoccia with:
Danny Scoccia United States
OfficialDocuments
Adam Cureton United States
Nigel Biggar United Kingdom
Ruwen Ogien France
Stephen J. Pope United States
Joanna Vecchiarelli Scott United States
Mary M. Keys United States
Jean‐Sébastien Eideliman France
Johannes Giesinger Switzerland
Ben Colburn relative to Danny Scoccia United States Danny Scoccia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Danny Scoccia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Colburn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Colburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Colburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Colburn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Colburn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Colburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Colburn. The network helps show where Ben Colburn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Ben Colburn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Colburn Line = papers co-authored together Ben Colburn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201143
2
The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political and Moral Philosophy
200821
3 201014
4 202213
5 200713
6 201910
7 20077
8 20226
9 20106
10 20144
11 20233
12 20123
13 20152
14 20121
15 20241
16
Methods in Ethics: The Virtual Issue of the Aristotelian Society 3
20151
17 20081
18 20101
19 20181
20 20210

About Ben Colburn

Ben Colburn is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 151 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (28 citations), Political Science and International Relations (57 citations), General Health Professions (31 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (25 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (48 citations). Ben Colburn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Sudan and Mongolia. Frequent co-authors include Matthew H. Kramer, Bridget Johnston, Hallvard Lillehammer, Georgios Karyotis, Dimitris Skleparis, Kristinn Hermannsson and Gareth Mulvey. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Philosophy of Education, Journal of Moral Philosophy, Bioethics, The Philosophical Quarterly and The Monist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact