Ben Bullock

420 citations
26 papers · 273 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Ben Bullock

23 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers

Ben Bullock
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 90
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 132
  • Biological Psychiatry 16
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 64
  • Applied Psychology 16
Replace John F. Gottlieb with:
John F. Gottlieb United States
Mehmed Yücel Ağargün Türkiye
Samuel J Hockey Australia
Knut Langsrud Norway
Kieulinh Michelle Tran United States
Akiko Murakoshi Japan
Jasmyn E. A. Cunningham Canada
Benjamin Putois France
Jaap Meijer Netherlands
Constantin Psarros Greece
Ben Bullock relative to John F. Gottlieb United States John F. Gottlieb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
John F. Gottlieb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ben Bullock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ben Bullock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ben Bullock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ben Bullock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ben Bullock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ben Bullock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ben Bullock. The network helps show where Ben Bullock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ben Bullock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ben Bullock Line = papers co-authored together Ben Bullock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202052
2 201922
3 201322
4 201121
5 201719
6 202114
7 201414
8 201714
9 202113
10 201913
11 201811
12 202210
13
An Interdisciplinary Perspective on the Association Between Chronotype and Well-being.
201910
14 20227
15 20167
16 20226
17 20215
18 20143
19 20183
20 20072

About Ben Bullock

Ben Bullock is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (8 papers), Sleep and related disorders (8 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (7 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (5 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (3 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (90 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (132 citations), Biological Psychiatry (16 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (64 citations) and Applied Psychology (16 citations). Ben Bullock has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Greg Murray, Fiona Judd, Maciej Stolarski, Joanna Gorgol, Denny Meyer, John F. Gottlieb, Sean W. Cain, Elise M. McGlashan, Angus C. Burns and Vadim Zipunnikov. Their work appears in journals such as Chronobiology International, Journal of Sleep Research, Bipolar Disorders, European Journal of Epidemiology and Behavioral Sleep Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact